A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model for hierarchical structure assessment: A case study in road safety performance evaluation

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a powerful analytical research tool for measuring the relative efficiency of a homogeneous set of decision making units (DMUs) by obtaining empirical estimates of relations between multiple inputs and multiple outputs related to the DMUs. To further embody multilayer hierarchical structures of these inputs and outputs in the DEA framework, which are prevalent in today's performance evaluation activities, we propose a generalized multiple layer DEA (MLDEA) model. Starting from the input-oriented CCR model, we elaborate the mathematical deduction process of the MLDEA model, formulate the weights in each layer of the hierarchy, and indicate different types of possible weight restrictions. Meanwhile, its linear transformation is realized and further extended to the BCC form. To demonstrate the proposed MLDEA model, a case study in evaluating the road safety performance of a set of 19 European countries is carried out. By using 13 hierarchical safety performance indicators in terms of road user behavior (e.g., inappropriate or excessive speed) as the model's input and 4 layered road safety final outcomes (e.g., road fatalities) as the output, we compute the most optimal road safety efficiency score for the set of European countries, and further analyze the weights assigned to each layer of the hierarchy. A comparison of the results with the ones from the one layer DEA model clearly indicates the usefulness and effectiveness of this improvement in dealing with a great number of performance evaluation activities with hierarchical structures.

[1]  Guilbert Jj The World Health Report 2006: working together for health. , 2006 .

[2]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Building the European Road Safety Observatory. SafetyNet. Deliverable D3.11a Road safety performance indicators : updated country comparisons , 2006 .

[3]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  The non-archimedean CCR ratio for efficiency analysis: A rejoinder to Boyd and Färe☆ , 1984 .

[5]  Chiang Kao,et al.  A linear formulation of the two-level DEA model , 2008 .

[6]  Soroosh Nalchigar,et al.  Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[9]  Geert Wets,et al.  Benchmarking road safety: lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Tyrone T. Lin,et al.  Application of DEA in analyzing a bank's operating performance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  E. Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: some practical suggestions , 2007 .

[12]  Franziska Achterberg Raising Compliance with Road Safety Law: 1st Road Safety PIN Report , 2007 .

[13]  F Achterberg Raising compliance with road safety law , 2011 .

[14]  Elke Hermans,et al.  A methodology for developing a composite road safety performance index for cross-coountry comparison , 2009 .

[15]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Road Safety Performance Indicators: Theory. Deliverable D3.6 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. , 2007 .

[16]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[17]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[18]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[19]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[20]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[21]  Da Ruan,et al.  Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  K Rumar THE HUMAN FACTOR IN ROAD SAFETY , 1982 .

[24]  Li Qi,et al.  Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation , 2008 .

[25]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[26]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[27]  Fred Wegman,et al.  SUNflowerNext: Towards A Composite Road Safety Performance Index , 2008 .

[28]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis , 2007 .

[29]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[30]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..