Social Loafing: A Review of the Literature

In 1913 a phenomenon was found that, at the time, did not receive sufficient attention. Maximilien Ringelmann, a French agricultural engineer, observed that when a group of people collectively pulled on a rope, the output was less than when group members individually pulled on the rope (Kravitz and Martin, 1986; Ringelmann, 1913). The results of this finding were not considered further until 1974 when Ingham, Levinger, Graves, and Peckham recreated the experiment. The term “social loafing” was coined for the discovery that participants working in groups exert less effort than participants working individually. It was described as having a detrimental effect on individuals and the institutions associated with them (Latane, Williams, & Harkins, 1979). From there, the research evolved into five distinct categories: 1) establishing the existence of social loafing in both physical and cognitive group projects, 2) causes and deterrents of social loafing, 3) partner adaptation to group member social loafing (such as the “Sucker Effect”), 4) social loafing as a positive mechanism, and finally 5) social loafing in modern technology.

[1]  Gérard Roland,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies , 2016 .

[2]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Team Size, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Dustin J. Bluhm.  ADAPTIVE CONSEQUENCES OF SOCIAL LOAFING. , 2009 .

[4]  Hwee Hoon,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Social Loafing: The Role of Personality, Motives, and Contextual Factors , 2008, The Journal of psychology.

[5]  J. Shaw,et al.  Preference for Group Work, Winning Orientation, and Social Loafing Behavior in Groups , 2007 .

[6]  N. Anderson,et al.  The Moderating Influence of Personality and Culture on Social Loafing in Typical Versus Maximum Performance Situations , 2007 .

[7]  Claudia J. Ferrante,et al.  Getting More out of Team Projects: Incentivizing Leadership to Enhance Performance , 2006 .

[8]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .

[9]  S. Harkins,et al.  Social Loafing and Self-Evaluation With a Social Standard , 2004 .

[10]  Pascal Huguet,et al.  Social loafing and self-beliefs: People's collective effort depends on the extent to which they distinguish themselves as better than others , 1998 .

[11]  A W Gaillard,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing under Fatigue , 2022 .

[12]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: The case of social loafing , 1995 .

[13]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Social loafing as response to an appraisal of appropriate effort. , 1990 .

[15]  S. Harkins.  Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard*1 , 1988 .

[16]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support. , 1986 .

[17]  S. Harkins,et al.  Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. , 1985 .

[18]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. , 1985 .

[19]  N. Kerr.  Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[20]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[21]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[22]  K. Williams,et al.  Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy? , 1980 .

[23]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[24]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Effects of Group Size on Cognitive Effort and Evaluation , 1977 .

[25]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[26]  E. Thomas,et al.  Effects of group size. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.