Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework

Populations in fragmented landscapes experience reduced gene flow, lose genetic diversity over time and ultimately face greater extinction risk. Improving connectivity in fragmented landscapes is now a major focus of conservation biology. Designing effective wildlife corridors for this purpose, however, requires an accurate understanding of how landscapes shape gene flow. The preponderance of landscape resistance models generated to date, however, is subjectively parameterized based on expert opinion or proxy measures of gene flow. While the relatively few studies that use genetic data are more rigorous, frameworks they employ frequently yield models only weakly related to the observed patterns of genetic isolation. Here, we describe a new framework that uses expert opinion as a starting point. By systematically varying each model parameter, we sought to either validate the assumptions of expert opinion, or identify a peak of support for a new model more highly related to genetic isolation. This approach also accounts for interactions between variables, allows for nonlinear responses and excludes variables that reduce model performance. We demonstrate its utility on a population of mountain goats inhabiting a fragmented landscape in the Cascade Range, Washington.

[1]  Helene H. Wagner,et al.  Landscape Genetics , 2008 .

[2]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[3]  J. Goudet FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics , 1995 .

[4]  C. Rice Seasonal Altitudinal Movements of Mountain Goats , 2008 .

[5]  D. McDonald,et al.  HIGH CONNECTIVITY AND MINIMAL GENETIC STRUCTURE AMONG NORTH AMERICAN BOREAL OWL (AEGOLIUS FUNEREUS) POPULATIONS, REGARDLESS OF HABITAT MATRIX , 2007 .

[6]  Neil J. Anderson,et al.  Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. , 2009, Ecology.

[7]  L. Waits,et al.  Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics , 2007, Heredity.

[8]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results , 2009, Conservation Genetics.

[9]  MODELING THE ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL OF ISOLATED POPULATIONS: EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATIONS USING DROSOPHILA , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  D. Coltman,et al.  Characterization of 29 polymorphic artiodactyl microsatellite markers for the mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) , 2005 .

[11]  Peter B. Mather,et al.  Corridors and connectivity: when use and function do not equate , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  T. Ricketts The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics , 2007 .

[14]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Oosterhout,et al.  Estimation and adjustment of microsatellite null alleles in nonequilibrium populations , 2006 .

[16]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[17]  B. Mcrae,et al.  ISOLATION BY RESISTANCE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  M Slatkin,et al.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. , 1995, Genetics.

[19]  C. Oosterhout,et al.  Micro-Checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data , 2004 .

[20]  Rousset Genetic differentiation between individuals , 1999 .

[21]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Representing genetic variation as continuous surfaces: An approach for identifying spatial dependency in landscape genetic studies , 2008 .

[22]  Derek A Roff,et al.  Inbreeding depression in the wild , 1999, Heredity.

[23]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[24]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[25]  F. Rousset,et al.  ARE PARTIAL MANTEL TESTS ADEQUATE? , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  H. Wittmer Mountain goats: ecology, behavior, and conservation of an alpine ungulate , 2008 .

[27]  S. Cushman,et al.  Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[28]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[29]  Ian J. Wang,et al.  Landscape genetics and least‐cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[30]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[31]  J. Evans,et al.  Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. , 2010, Ecology.

[32]  H. Siegismund,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in Denmark: populations are islands in a fragmented landscape , 2009, Conservation Genetics.

[33]  M. Lynch,et al.  Mutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[34]  R. Lande Risk of population extinction from fixation of deleterious and reverse mutations , 2004, Genetica.

[35]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[36]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[37]  Clifford Gr Ice EFFECTS OF MOUNTAIN GOAT HARVEST ON HISTORIC AND CONTEMPORARY POPULATIONS , 2010 .

[38]  M. Fortin,et al.  Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[39]  S. Wahlund ZUSAMMENSETZUNG VON POPULATIONEN UND KORRELATIONSERSCHEINUNGEN VOM STANDPUNKT DER VERERBUNGSLEHRE AUS BETRACHTET , 2010 .

[40]  J. Arnaud Metapopulation genetic structure and migration pathways in the land snail Helix aspersa: influence of landscape heterogeneity , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors , 2009 .

[42]  Ych-chu Wang Molecular ecology , 1992, Journal of Northeast Forestry University.

[43]  A. Coffin From roadkill to road ecology : a review of the ecological effects of roads , 2007 .

[44]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[45]  S. Castellano,et al.  IS THE PARTIAL MANTEL TEST INADEQUATE? , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites , 1994, Nature.

[47]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Applications of graph theory to landscape genetics , 2008, Evolutionary applications.

[49]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data , 2007 .

[50]  Yu-Huang Wang,et al.  Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  R. Lande,et al.  Mutation and Conservation , 1995 .

[52]  D. Reich,et al.  Population Structure and Eigenanalysis , 2006, PLoS genetics.