Multi‐attribute group decision‐making methods based on q‐rung orthopair fuzzy linguistic sets

With the continuous development of the economy and society, decision‐making problems and decision‐making scenarios have become more complex. The q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set is getting more and more attention from researchers, which is more general and flexible than Pythagorean fuzzy set and intuitionistic fuzzy set under complex vague environment. In this study, the concept of q‐rung orthopair fuzzy linguistic set (q‐ROFLS) is proposed and a new q‐rung orthopair fuzzy linguistic method is developed to handle MAGDM problem. Firstly, the conception, operation laws, comparison methods, and distance measure methods of the q‐ROFLS are proposed. Secondly, the q‐ROFL weighted average operator, q‐ROFL ordered weighted average operator, q‐ROFL hybrid weighted average operator, q‐ROFL weighted geometric operator, q‐ROFL ordered weighted geometric operator, and q‐ROFL hybrid weighted geometric operator are proposed, and some interesting properties, special cases of these operators are investigated. Furthermore, a new method to cope with MAGDM problem based on q‐ROFL weighted average operator (q‐ROFL weighted geometric operator) is developed. Finally, a practical example for suppliers selection is provided to verify the practicality of the presented method, and the effectiveness and flexibility of the presented method are illustrated by sensitive analysis and comparative analysis.

[1]  Masaharu Mizumoto,et al.  Some Properties of Fuzzy Sets of Type 2 , 1976, Inf. Control..

[2]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making Based on q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Power Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[4]  Peng Wang,et al.  Some q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and their Applications to Multiple‐Attribute Decision Making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[5]  Huimin Zhang,et al.  Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Application in MAGDM , 2014, J. Appl. Math..

[6]  Zhijun Yang,et al.  A new trapezoidal Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic entropic combined ordered weighted averaging operator and its application for enterprise location , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[7]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a novel MCDM approach , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Naif Alajlan,et al.  Aspects of generalized orthopair fuzzy sets , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[9]  Pushpinder Singh,et al.  A Recent Development of Numerical Methods for Solving Convection-Diffusion Problems , 2012 .

[10]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy sets and systems ' . Theory and applications , 2007 .

[11]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[12]  Chao Liu,et al.  An Approach to Multicriteria Group Decision-Making with Unknown Weight Information Based on Pythagorean Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Aggregation Operators , 2017 .

[13]  Sheng-Fuu Lin,et al.  Two-Strategy reinforcement group cooperation based symbiotic evolution for TSK-type fuzzy controller design , 2012, Artif. Intell. Res..

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - II , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Peng Wang,et al.  Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Based on Archimedean Bonferroni Operators of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Numbers , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  A trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to identify and evaluate critical success factors for humanitarian relief logistics management , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[17]  K. Atanassov,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[18]  Yanbing Liu,et al.  A Novel Approach for Linguistic Group Decision Making Based on Generalized Interval‐Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Induced Hybrid Operator and TOPSIS , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[19]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[20]  Yi Peng,et al.  MCDM approach to evaluating bank loan default models , 2014 .

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Qian Yu,et al.  A Novel Method for Multiattribute Decision Making with Interval‐Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[23]  Naif Alajlan,et al.  Approximate reasoning with generalized orthopair fuzzy sets , 2017, Inf. Fusion.

[24]  Yang Yong,et al.  Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic set , 2016 .

[25]  Peide Liu,et al.  Some q‐Rung Orthopai Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application to Multi‐Attribute Group Decision Making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[26]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[27]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  Optimal recharge and driving strategies for a battery-powered electric vehicle , 1999 .

[28]  Peide Liu,et al.  Pythagorean uncertain linguistic partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[29]  Jian Wu A SD-IITFOWA operator and TOPSIS based approach for MAGDM problems with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2015 .

[30]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[31]  Muhammad Irfan Ali,et al.  Another view on q‐rung orthopair fuzzy sets , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[32]  Peide Liu,et al.  Multiple attribute decision‐making method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q‐rung orthopair fuzzy environment , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[33]  Hui Gao,et al.  Some q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[34]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[36]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[37]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[38]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group Decision Making with Triangular Fuzzy Linguistic Variables , 2007, IDEAL.

[39]  Peng Xindon,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Soft Set and Its Application , 2015 .

[40]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[41]  Jun Wang,et al.  A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user's perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[42]  Xiaolu Zhang,et al.  Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[43]  Peide Liu,et al.  Some power Maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic numbers and their application to group decision making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[44]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy subsets , 2013, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).