Public understanding of science: using technology to enhance school science in everyday life

In this paper, one aspect of public understanding of science is discussed: the use of school science in students' everyday lives. Given the difficulties of using traditional school science in everyday life, the author discusses the possibility of introducing aspects of technology into the science curriculum. It is shown that technology, as curricular content, provides pragmatic models that can be used to connect school science with students' everyday lives. It is argued that the goal of connecting school science to students' everyday lives moves the discussion of public understanding of science to public understanding of technology. The implications and limitations of this movement are also examined.

[1]  M. Shamos,et al.  The Myth of Scientific Literacy , 1995 .

[2]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[3]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[4]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Creating Lifelong Science Learners: What Models Form a Firm Foundation? , 1996 .

[5]  J. Lewis.  Teaching school physics , 1972 .

[6]  Angelo Collins,et al.  National Science Education Standards: Looking Backward and Forward , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History , 1990 .

[8]  David Layton,et al.  Science for the people , 1973 .

[9]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity , 1992 .

[10]  Nancy G. Nagel,et al.  Learning Through Real-World Problem Solving: The Power of Integrative Teaching , 1996 .

[11]  Senta B. Raizen.  Technology Education in the Classroom: Understanding the Designed World. , 1995 .

[12]  E. Jenkins.  Public Understanding of Science and Science Education for Action. , 1994 .

[13]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Art and Artifact of Children's Designing: A Situated Cognition Perspective , 1996 .

[14]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  School science and its problems with scientific literacy , 1997 .

[15]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: Two theories of home heat control , 1987 .

[16]  F. Kreith,et al.  Principles of heat transfer , 1962 .

[17]  T. Lewis,et al.  Introducing technology into school curricula , 1991 .

[18]  Henry Petroski,et al.  To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design , 1986 .

[19]  D. Layton.  Technology's challenge to science education , 1993 .

[20]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Overview: Students' models and epistemologies of science , 1991 .

[21]  Douglas A. Roberts,et al.  Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices , 2000 .

[22]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Two Theories of Home Heat Control , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Understanding of Science , 1995 .

[24]  Joan Solomon,et al.  STS education : international perspectives on reform , 1994 .

[25]  Using out‐of‐school experience in science lessons: an impossible task? , 1998 .

[26]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? , 1991 .

[27]  Ivor Goodson,et al.  Studying Curriculum: Cases and Methods , 1994 .

[28]  Stephen Knutton,et al.  Using out-of-school experience in science lessons: reality or rhetoric? , 1997 .

[29]  Edward L. Smith.  A conceptual change model of learning science , 1991 .

[30]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[31]  Douglas P. Newton.  Relevance and science education , 1988 .