Objective Responses in Patients with Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Cancer in Early Clinical Studies Do Not Predict Regulatory Approval

Purpose: Tumor responses in early-phase trials are used to determine whether new agents warrant further study. Given that spontaneous regressions are observed in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, this study assessed whether tumor responses, particularly in these two tumor types, predict for future regulatory drug approval. Experimental Design: The literature was reviewed to assess tumor response rates to cytotoxic agents in phase I and II trials in the following solid tumors: melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumors. Response rates were categorized and the relationship of these categories to the end point of regulatory drug approval was determined. Results: Fifty-eight drugs were assessed in 100 phase I trials, and 46 of these drugs were also studied in 499 phase II trials. Higher overall response rates in both phase I trials (P = 0.03) and phase II trials (P < 0.0001) were predictive of regulatory approval. However, response in melanoma or renal cell carcinoma was not predictive for either phase I or phase II studies. Conclusions: For cytotoxic agents, although overall objective response rates reliably predict subsequent marketing approval, isolated responses in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma are not predictive.

[1]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[2]  G. Steele,et al.  Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1983 .

[3]  D. D. Hoff,et al.  Response rates, duration of response, and dose response effects in phase I studies of antineoplastics , 1991, Investigational New Drugs.

[4]  Daniel,et al.  There are no bad anticancer agents, only bad clinical trial designs--twenty-first Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation Award Lecture. , 1998 .

[5]  T. Kuzel,et al.  A review of recent findings involving interleukin-2-based cancer therapy , 2004, Current opinion in oncology.

[6]  N. Saijo,et al.  Relationship between objective responses in phase I trials and potential efficacy of non-specific cytotoxic investigational new drugs. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  I. Avinoach,et al.  Metastatic Malignant Melanoma with Spontaneous and Complete Regression of the Primary Lesion , 1994 .

[8]  J. Glaspy Therapeutic options in the management of renal cell carcinoma. , 2002, Seminars in oncology.

[9]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[10]  M Paesmans,et al.  Response to chemotherapy has predictive value for further survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 10 years experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[11]  R Simon,et al.  Statistical model to determine the relationship of response and survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  L. Påhlman,et al.  The relationship between an objective response to chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years? , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[14]  P. Mulders,et al.  Current treatment of renal cell carcinoma. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  R. Bumsted,et al.  Case Report and Literature Review , 1980 .

[16]  R. Wittes,et al.  Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents. , 1986, Cancer treatment reports.

[17]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[18]  J. Lokich Spontaneous regression of metastatic renal cancer. Case report and literature review. , 1997, American journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  L. Seymour,et al.  Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[20]  S. Taillibert,et al.  Metastatic melanoma: chemotherapy. , 2002, Seminars in oncology.

[21]  G QVIST,et al.  Spontaneous Regression of Cancer , 1963, British medical journal.

[22]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology , 2006 .

[23]  M. Gleave,et al.  Placebo‐associated remissions in a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind trial of interferon γ‐1b for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2000 .