Joint Electricity and Heat Optimal Power Flow of Energy Hubs

Energy hubs as the intermediate in multi-carrier energy systems would enable various carriers, to be stored and converted. This concept requires an infrastructure to investigate the new upcoming economical as well as technical impacts on the system performance. The development in utilization of distributed generations, especially co-generation systems, along with movement towards more efficient systems creates sufficient incentives to promote energy service networks by coordinating numerous energy networks. District electric and heating systems provide electrical and heat energies, the most common demands for end-users. On the other hand, the heating load profile of the multi-carrier energy network can be modified to handle the heat and power interdependency in combined heat and power units. In this regard, this chapter endeavors to arise a general modeling and optimization scheme for coupled power flow investigation on various energy networks. The presented optimal power flow model includes conversion and transmission of multiple energy carriers. The connections between the power and heat foundations are precisely considered based on the recent impression of energy hubs. A generic optimality situation for optimal scheduling of multiple energy carriers is acquired. Moreover, the multi-carrier energy network takes advantages of the curtailable and responsive heating demand of DHN by employing a demand response program. In the suggested energy hub framework, the energy and continuity laws as well as the characteristic of district heating system’s major elements comprising heat sources, heat-exchangers, and the network of pipelines are modeled. The district heat network analysis would specify the supply and return temperatures at each node and the mass flow rates in each pipe. In addition, electric network operation constraints such as voltage magnitude of buses and line flow limits have been taken into account. Finally, the simulation outcomes are deliberated for a test system to establish the applicability and effectiveness of suggested model in the multi-carrier energy systems.

[1]  Hongping Zhao,et al.  Analysis, modelling and operational optimization of district heating systems , 1995 .

[2]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  Quantifying Changes in Building Electricity Use, With Application to Demand Response , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Jose Medina,et al.  Demand Response and Distribution Grid Operations: Opportunities and Challenges , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  G. Andersson,et al.  Energy hubs for the future , 2007, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[5]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Optimal risk-constrained participation of industrial cogeneration systems in the day-ahead energy markets , 2016 .

[6]  Heresh Seyedi,et al.  Power Flow Constrained Short-Term Scheduling of CHP Units , 2017 .

[7]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Operational and Structural Optimization of Multi-Carrier Energy Systems ¤ , 2006 .

[8]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  Innovations in Power Systems Reliability , 2011 .

[9]  Ivan Grant,et al.  FLOW INDUCED VIBRATIONS IN PIPES, A FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH , 2010 .

[10]  C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel,et al.  A Unified Gas and Power Flow Analysis in Natural Gas and Electricity Coupled Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  Multiple-Energy Carriers: Modeling of Production, Delivery, and Consumption , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Integrated optimal power flow for electric power and heat in a MicroGrid , 2009 .

[13]  Mehdi Abapour,et al.  MINLP Probabilistic Scheduling Model for Demand Response Programs Integrated Energy Hubs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[14]  Jamshid Aghaei,et al.  Multi-objective self-scheduling of CHP (combined heat and power)-based microgrids considering demand response programs and ESSs (energy storage systems) , 2013 .

[15]  Michele Pinelli,et al.  Optimal sizing of a multi-source energy plant for power heat and cooling generation , 2014 .

[16]  Mahmud Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  A Decomposed Solution to Multiple-Energy Carriers Optimal Power Flow , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Hourly demand response in day-ahead scheduling for managing the variability of renewable energy , 2013 .

[18]  Sadegh Vaez-Zadeh,et al.  Optimal planning of energy hubs in interconnected energy systems: a case study for natural gas and electricity , 2015 .

[19]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  A robust optimization approach to energy hub management , 2012 .

[20]  Javad Olamaei,et al.  Economical scheduling of multi carrier energy systems integrating Renewable, Energy Storage and Demand Response under Energy Hub approach , 2013, 2013 Smart Grid Conference (SGC).

[21]  Alemayehu Gebremedhin Optimal utilisation of heat demand in district heating system—A case study , 2014 .

[22]  Ali Reza Seifi,et al.  Energy Flow Optimization in Multicarrier Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[23]  G. Andersson,et al.  Optimal Power Flow of Multiple Energy Carriers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  Shahab Bahrami,et al.  From Demand Response in Smart Grid Toward Integrated Demand Response in Smart Energy Hub , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[25]  Kankar Bhattacharya,et al.  Optimal Demand Response for Distribution Feeders With Existing Smart Loads , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[26]  Audrius Bagdanavicius,et al.  Combined analysis of electricity and heat networks , 2014 .