Flexible Homes, Flexible Care, Inflexible Organisations? The Role of Telecare in Supporting Independence

‘Telecare’ involves the use of information and communications technologies to provide support for vulnerable individuals living in the community. The UK government wishes to make telecare available in all homes that need it by 2010. This expansion is seen as central to the improvement of older people's independence and quality of life by enabling them to live at home whenever possible. The paper discusses the range of initiatives now in place to facilitate the introduction of telecare in the UK. It argues that while there is now experience of telecare through pilot and demonstration schemes, moving to mainstream service delivery is far from straightforward. Using a case study of a telecare scheme, along with supplementary data from other schemes, the paper explores the reasons why it may be hard to meet government objectives. These include the organisational and cultural characteristics of local care institutions and the complexity of scheme objectives. It draws conclusions on the challenges in meeting aspirations for mass telecare over the next decade and on the future role of the housing stock in care provision.

[1]  Penny Jennett,et al.  Organizational readiness for telemedicine: Implications for success and failure , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[2]  David Hailey,et al.  A profile of success and failure in telehealth – evidence and opinion from the Successes and Failures in Telehealth conferences , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  Richard Curry,et al.  The design of pilot telecare projects and their integration into mainstream service delivery , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Housing Quality and the Provision of Accessible Homes , 2003 .

[5]  Robert Baldwin National Service Framework for Older People , 2003 .

[6]  Tim Venables,et al.  Smart Home, Dumb Suppliers? The Future of Smart Homes Markets , 2003 .

[7]  John Young,et al.  National Service Framework for Older People , 2002 .

[8]  T. L. Williams,et al.  Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  John Woolham,et al.  Building a Local Infrastructure that Supports the Use of Assistive Technology in the Care of People with Dementia , 2002 .

[10]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[11]  James Wallace,et al.  Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review , 2001, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[12]  M. Fisk,et al.  The implications of smart home technologies , 2001 .

[13]  S. Brownsell,et al.  An attributable cost model for a telecare system using advanced community alarms , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  Rodney Harrison,et al.  Crossing the housing and care divide , 2001 .

[15]  C. May,et al.  Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. , 2001, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  Sally Wyatt,et al.  Ict Innovation In Central Government: Learning From The Past , 2000 .

[17]  D. Quilgars Low intensity support services: A systematic review of effectiveness , 2000 .

[18]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  J Sixsmith,et al.  Smart care technologies: meeting whose needs? , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[20]  P. Tang,et al.  'Smart' homes and telecare for independent living , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[21]  S. Håkansson,et al.  What do we really know about the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine? , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  A. Tinker Health begins at home: Planning at the health-housing interface for older people , 2000 .

[23]  L. Harrison,et al.  Health Begins at Home: The Housing-Health Interface for Older People , 2000, Reviews on environmental health.

[24]  Bob Gann,et al.  Information for Health , 1999, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[25]  G. Williams,et al.  A systems approach to achieving CarerNet-an integrated and intelligent telecare system , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[26]  Brian Shaw,et al.  Innovation and new product development in the UK medical equipment industry , 1998 .

[27]  R. Bull Housing options for disabled people , 1998 .

[28]  R. Rothwell Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[29]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Marketing new technology: Markets, hierarchies, and user‐initiated innovation , 1988 .

[30]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Innovation and re‐innovation: A role for the user , 1986 .

[31]  B. Shaw The Role of the Interaction between the User and the Manufacturer in Medical Equipment Innovation , 1985 .

[32]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Technology push and need pull: A new perspective , 1984 .

[33]  J. B. Gregg,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. , 1910, California state journal of medicine.

[34]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation , 1978 .