Planning as a Rhetorical Activity: Survey Research as a Trope in Arguments About Electric Power Planning in Chicago
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Black,et al. The Rhetoric of Economics , 1986 .
[2] Guy B. Adams,et al. Planners and public expectations , 1983 .
[3] Gerald B. Wetlaufer. Rhetoric and Its Denial in Legal Discourse , 1990 .
[4] Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al. The Fragility of Goodness , 1986 .
[5] H A Goldstein,et al. Planning as Argumentation , 1984 .
[6] Arjo Klamer,et al. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric , 1989 .
[7] D. Kolb,et al. Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .
[8] Patsy Healey,et al. A Planner's Day: Knowledge and Action in Communicative Practice , 1992 .
[9] C. Hoch. Doing Good and Being Right The Pragmatic Connection in Planning Theory , 1984 .
[10] Earl R. Babbie,et al. Survey Research Methods , 1984 .
[11] J. Throgmorton. The rhetorics of policy analysis , 1991 .
[12] James A. Throgmorton,et al. Planning as Persuasive Storytelling About the Future: Negotiating an Electric Power Rate Settlement in Illinois , 1992 .
[13] H. Lind. The Myth of Institutionalist Method , 1993 .
[14] J. Nelson,et al. Narrative Reason in Public Argument , 1985 .
[15] J. Throgmorton,et al. Institutional Change and Electric Power in the City of Chicago , 1993 .
[16] E. Freund. The return of the reader , 1987 .
[17] T. Ball. When Words Lose Their Meaning , 1986, Ethics.
[18] Stanley Fish,et al. Is There a Text in This Class? , 1981, Campus Wars.
[19] Giandomenico Majone,et al. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process , 1989 .