In‐vivo compatibility between pacemakers and dental equipment

In-vitro studies suggest that electromagnetic interference can occur under specific conditions involving proximity between electronic dental equipment and pacemakers. At present, in-vivo investigations to verify the effect of using electronic dental equipment in clinical conditions on patients with pacemakers are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate, in vivo, the effect of three commonly used electronic dental instruments - ultrasonic dental scaler, electric pulp tester, and electronic apex locator - on patients with different pacemaker brands and configurations. Sixty-six consecutive non-pacemaker-dependent patients were enrolled during regular electrophysiology follow-up visits. Electronic dental tools were operated while the pacemaker was interrogated, and the intracardiac electrogram and electrocardiogram were recorded. No interferences were detected in the intracardiac electrogram of any patient during the tests with dental equipment. No abnormalities in pacemaker pacing and sensing function were observed, and no differences were found with respect to the variables, pacemaker brands, pacemaker configuration, or mode of application of the dental equipment. Electromagnetic interferences affecting the surface electrocardiogram, but not the intracardiac electrogram, were found in 25 (37.9%) patients, especially while using the ultrasonic dental scaler; the intrinsic function of the pacemakers was not affected. Under real clinical conditions, none of the electronic dental instruments tested interfered with pacemaker function.

[1]  V. Reddy,et al.  Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review , 2017, Circulation.

[2]  J. Miranda-Rius,et al.  Risk of electromagnetic interference induced by dental equipment on cardiac implantable electrical devices. , 2016, European journal of oral sciences.

[3]  C. Lamas,et al.  Influence of electronic apex locators and a gutta-percha heating device on implanted cardiac devices: an in vivo study. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[4]  A. J. A. D. da Cunha,et al.  Electromagnetic interference of endodontic equipments with cardiovascular implantable electronic device. , 2016, E -journal of dentistry.

[5]  Lluís Mont,et al.  Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study , 2015, European heart journal.

[6]  J. Miranda-Rius,et al.  Capacity of dental equipment to interfere with cardiac implantable electrical devices. , 2015, European journal of oral sciences.

[7]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Interference between dental electrical devices and pacemakers or defibrillators: results from a prospective clinical study. , 2015, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  C. Maiorana,et al.  Do ultrasonic dental scalers interfere with implantable cardioverter defibrillators? An in vivo investigation. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Electromagnetic interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from low-frequency electromagnetic fields in vivo. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  U. Lakshmanadoss,et al.  Artefactual spikes in electrocardiography: a worthwhile introspection. , 2013, Singapore medical journal.

[11]  Nora Goldschlager,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference and Implanted Cardiac Devices: The Medical Environment (Part II) , 2012, Clinical cardiology.

[12]  M. Stone,et al.  Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  H Jafarzadeh,et al.  Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part II: electric pulp tests and test cavities. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[14]  G. Crossley,et al.  More about pacemakers. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Interference of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator activity during electronic dental device use. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  A. Baranchuk,et al.  Electromagnetic interference produced by a hearing aid device on electrocardiogram recording. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemaker , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  A. V. Amerongen,et al.  Interference of electrical dental equipment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators , 2007, BDJ.

[19]  T. Arabacı,et al.  Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. , 2007, International journal of dental hygiene.

[20]  C. Broberg,et al.  Safety of electronic apex locators and pulp testers in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter/defibrillators. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  E. Lessard,et al.  Absence of in vivo effects of dental instruments on pacemaker function , 2005 .

[22]  J. Marshall,et al.  An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Ultrasonic dental scaler: associated hazards. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  Raphael R. Garofalo,et al.  Effect of electronic apex locators on cardiac pacemaker function. , 2002 .

[25]  R. Genco,et al.  Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  W. Brady,et al.  Artifactual electrocardiographic change mimicking clinical abnormality on the ECG. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[27]  S. Pinski,et al.  Interference with cardiac pacing. , 2000, Cardiology clinics.

[28]  L H Woolley,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of electrical pulp testers on dogs with artificial pacemakers. , 1974, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[29]  N. Subha,et al.  Interference of apex locator, pulp tester and diathermy on pacemaker function , 2015, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[30]  陈涵 ACC/AHA/HRS 发布新版成人室上性心动过速指南 , 2015 .

[31]  Claudia Stöllberger,et al.  Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[32]  F. Moglie,et al.  Experimental and numeric investigation about electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac pacemaker and magnetic fields at power line frequency. , 2007, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[33]  Position paper update. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[34]  I. Cygankiewicz,et al.  From Unipolar to Bipolar Leads: Fewer Problems, More Advantages? , 2003 .