On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact

This paper analyzes the effect of interdisciplinarity on the scientific impact of individual papers. Using all the papers published in Web of Science in 2000, we define the degree of interdisciplinarity of a given paper as the percentage of its cited references made to journals of other disciplines. We show that, although for all disciplines combined there is no clear correlation between the level of interdisciplinarity of papers and their citation rates, there are nonetheless some disciplines in which a higher level of interdisciplinarity is related to a higher citation rates. For other disciplines, citations decline as interdisciplinarity grows. One characteristic is visible in all disciplines: highly disciplinary and highly interdisciplinary papers have a low scientific impact. This suggests that there might be an optimum of interdisciplinarity beyond which the research is too dispersed to find its niche and under which it is too mainstream to have high impact. Finally, the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact is highly determined by the citation characteristics of the disciplines involved: papers citing citation intensive disciplines are more likely to be cited by those disciplines and, hence, obtain higher citation scores than papers citing non citation intensive disciplines.

[1]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  D. T. Tomov,et al.  Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science , 1996, Scientometrics.

[4]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Practicing Interdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[5]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange , 2001, Scientometrics.

[6]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics , 2002, Scientometrics.

[8]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[11]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  An indicator of cross-disciplinary research , 1985, Scientometrics.

[12]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[13]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[14]  Eduard Jan Rinia,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of interdisciplinary research and knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[15]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science , 2002, Scientometrics.

[16]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Modeling a century of citation distributions , 2008, J. Informetrics.