A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: Description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke

We developed a system for quantitatively measuring arm movement. Our approach provides a method to simultaneously capture upper limb kinetic and kinematic data during assisted passive arm movements. Data are analysed with respect to Cartesian and upper limb coordinate systems to obtain upper limb joint angles and torques. We undertook an evaluation of the system in participants with stroke to show the feasibility of this approach. During rehabilitation after stroke, one aspect of treatment includes the physiotherapist applying assistive forces to move the impaired arm of the patient who remains passive. There is a dearth of published data on the relationship between upper limb kinematics and the underlying forces (kinetics) in this mode of physiotherapy treatment. Such quantitative data are crucial in facilitating research into therapy practice, for example by measuring variation in practice and determining dosage. An experienced therapist prescribed passive movements tailored to the needs of 16 participants with stroke (41-81 years) with a range of anthropometric sizes and motor impairments. Our novel measurement tool recorded kinematic and kinetic data at 100 Hz for 6-11 movements per participant. The kinetic data show that the majority of movements fall within upper limits of 36.7 N in shoulder elevation, 22.4N in shoulder protraction, 4.6 Nm in shoulder abduction, 12.8 Nm in shoulder flexion, 2.4 Nm in shoulder rotation and 5.5 Nm in elbow flexion. These data show the potential of this system to better understand arm movement, in particular to objectively evaluate physical therapy treatments and support development of robotic devices to facilitate upper limb rehabilitation.

[1]  W. Rymer,et al.  Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Peter R. Culmer,et al.  Dual robot system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: The design process , 2007 .

[3]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Kinematic control of redundant robot manipulators: A tutorial , 1990, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[5]  Martin Levesley,et al.  The coordination of upper and lower arm rotation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Lynne Turner-Stokes,et al.  Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Dewald,et al.  Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation in Europe: What Do Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Actually Do? , 2006, Stroke.

[9]  Garth R Johnson,et al.  A study of the external forces and moments at the shoulder and elbow while performing every day tasks. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  M G Pandy,et al.  Computer modeling and simulation of human movement. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  R. C. Miall,et al.  Multi-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Stephen J. Ball,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Planar 3DOF Robotic Exoskeleton for Motor Assessment , 2009 .

[15]  C. Burgar,et al.  Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  J. E. Jackson A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[18]  Julius P A Dewald,et al.  Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  Robert Riener,et al.  Inverse dynamics as a tool for motion analysis: arm tracking movements in cerebellar patients , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Julius P. A. Dewald,et al.  A method to capture six-degrees-of-freedom mechanical measurements of isometric shoulder and elbow torques during event-related fMRI , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  Robert Richardson,et al.  A Control Strategy for Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation With a Dual Robot System , 2010, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[22]  Michael O'Brien,et al.  Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system: 6th edition , 2023, Practical Neurology.

[23]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation : guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill , 2003 .

[24]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  K. An,et al.  Parameters for modeling the upper extremity. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J D Crawford,et al.  Kinematic rules for upper and lower arm contributions to grasp orientation. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  S. Scott,et al.  A motor learning strategy reflects neural circuitry for limb control , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  G R Johnson,et al.  Computer simulation of the dynamics of a human arm and orthosis linkage mechanism , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[29]  W. Rymer,et al.  Assessment of Active and Passive Restraint During Guided Reaching After Chronic Brain Injury , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Antony J. Hodgson,et al.  Linear spring-damper model of the hypertonic elbow: reliability and validity , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.