Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access

The lexical and phonetic mapping of auditorily confusable L2 nonwords was examined by teaching L2 learners novel words and by later examining their word recognition using an eye-tracking paradigm. During word learning, two groups of highly proficient Dutch learners of English learned 20 English nonwords, of which 10 contained the English contrast /e/-ae/ (a confusable contrast for native Dutch speakers). One group of subjects learned the words by matching their auditory forms to pictured meanings, while a second group additionally saw the spelled forms of the words. We found that the group who received only auditory forms confused words containing /ae/ and /e/ symmetrically, i.e., both /ae/ and /e/ auditory tokens triggered looks to pictures containing both /ae/ and /e/. In contrast, the group who also had access to spelled forms showed the same asymmetric word recognition pattern found by previous studies, i.e., they only looked at pictures of words containing /e/ when presented with /e/ target tokens, but looked at pictures of words containing both /ae/ and /e/ when presented with /ae/ target tokens. The results demonstrate that L2 learners can form lexical contrasts for auditorily confusable novel L2 words. However, and most importantly, this study suggests that explicit information over the contrastive nature of two new sounds may be needed to build separate lexical representations for similar-sounding L2 words.

[1]  G. Keppel Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[2]  A. Weber,et al.  Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition , 2004 .

[3]  R. Smits,et al.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of second language acquisition , 1999 .

[5]  K. Rayner Eye movements and visual cognition : scene perception and reading , 1992 .

[6]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[7]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[8]  C. Pallier,et al.  The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries , 2001, Psychological science.

[9]  A. Cutler,et al.  Pseudo‐homophony in non‐native listening , 2004 .

[10]  S. Curtin,et al.  Phonological transfer and levels of representation: the perceptual acquisition of Thai voice and aspiration by English and French speakers , 1998 .

[11]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonetic precision in listening , 2005 .

[12]  Rachel Hayes-Harb,et al.  Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts , 2008 .

[13]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[15]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  P. Boersma,et al.  The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: Multiple-category assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish , 2002 .

[17]  Paola Escudero,et al.  The interrelation between the perception and production of English vowels by native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[18]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  Rachel Hayes-Harb Optimal L2 Speech Perception: Native Speakers of English and Japanese Consonant Length Contrasts , 2005 .

[20]  Burkhart Fischer,et al.  Saccadic Reaction Time: Implications for Reading, Dyslexia, and Visual Cognition , 1992 .

[21]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Category formation and the role of spectral quality in the perception and production of English front vowels , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[22]  J. Flege,et al.  Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels , 1997 .

[23]  R. Plomp,et al.  Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 50 male speakers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Takashi Otake,et al.  Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[25]  Mirjam Broersmab Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positionsa ) , 2005 .

[26]  Keren B. Shatzman,et al.  Prosodic Knowledge Affects the Recognition of Newly Acquired Words , 2006, Psychological science.

[27]  Joe Pater The perceptual acquisition of Thai phonology by English speakers: task and stimulus effects , 2003 .

[28]  Elizabeth Hughes,et al.  Proceedings of the 21th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 1997 .

[29]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[30]  David Deterding,et al.  The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation , 1997, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[31]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[32]  Tsuneo Yamada,et al.  Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/ , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[33]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words , 2003, Cognition.

[34]  G. V. van Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Falk Huettig,et al.  The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search , 2007 .

[36]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Sleep-Associated Changes in the Mental Representation of Spoken Words , 2007, Psychological science.