Discovery of symbols in design

In this work, we propose a mechanism for learning grounded symbols based on design experience as acquired by a CAD system. We discover the functionally feasible regions FFRs lying along lower dimensional surfaces or manifolds, reflecting latent interdependencies between design variables sometimes called chunks constitute the intermediate step between raw experience and the eventual symbol that arises after these patterns become stabilised through communication. We search this lower-dimensional manifolds using either linear or nonlinear techniques, and demonstrate low-dimensionality at three stages of an 'infant designer': a learning image schemas for fits and clearances using linear algorithms; b universal motor, 2-parameter - learning a non-linear manifold; c universal motor, 8-parameter, reducing to two parameters or chunks using both linear and nonlinear mappings.

[1]  James T. Allison,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of dynamic engineering systems , 2013 .

[2]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Analogical recognition of shape and structure in design drawings , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[3]  John S. Gero,et al.  QUALITATIVE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING ABOUT SHAPES , 1999 .

[4]  Martin Bloom,et al.  Technology and global industry: companies and nations in the world economy , 1988 .

[5]  Satish T. S. Bukkapatnam,et al.  Supporting Negotiations in the Early Stage of Large-Scale Mechanical System Design , 2005 .

[6]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Towards automating the discovery of certain innovative design principles through a clustering-based optimization technique , 2011 .

[8]  Ashok K. Goel A 30-year case study and 15 principles: Implications of an artificial intelligence methodology for functional modeling , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Peter J. Bickel,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimension , 2004, NIPS.

[10]  Matthew I. Campbell,et al.  Automating the conceptual design process: “From black box to component selection” , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[11]  John S. Gero,et al.  A Process Framework of Affordances in Design , 2012, Design Issues.

[12]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Learning from design experience in an agent-based design system , 2004 .

[13]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[14]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[15]  Vishwa Kalyanasundaram,et al.  A Function Based Approach for Product Integration , 2014 .

[16]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two? , 2004, Memory.

[17]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  Design as exploring constraints , 1985 .

[18]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[19]  Hong Liu,et al.  A mapping-based tree similarity algorithm and its application to ontology alignment , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks , 2003 .

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product family design knowledge representation, aggregation, reuse, and analysis , 2007, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[22]  Germán Castellanos-Domínguez,et al.  Regularization parameter choice in locally linear embedding , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[23]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design - Methods & Applications , 2013 .

[24]  Alain Bernard,et al.  The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[25]  Lawrence K. Saul,et al.  Think Globally, Fit Locally: Unsupervised Learning of Low Dimensional Manifold , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  M. Casasola,et al.  Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations. , 2003, Child development.

[27]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Introduction of a data schema to support a design repository , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[28]  John R. Dixon,et al.  Guiding conceptual design through behavioral reasoning , 1994 .

[29]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  The Backtalk of Self-Generated Sketches , 2003, Design Issues.

[30]  Stevan Harnad The Symbol Grounding Problem , 1999, ArXiv.

[31]  S. Vereza Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[32]  Shawn Martin,et al.  Estimating manifold dimension by inversion error , 2005, SAC '05.

[33]  Somwrita Sarkar,et al.  Community detection in graphs using singular value decomposition. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[35]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Discovering Structure in Design Databases Through Functional and Surface Based Mapping , 2013 .

[36]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.