Quantitative analysis of the public charging-point evolution: A demand-driven spatial modeling approach

The coverage standard of the current publicly accessible charging infrastructure is insufficient and considered as a major obstacle in the introduction to the market of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). Therefore, it is necessary to establish a publicly accessible charging infrastructure that features an appropriate coverage standard. The aim of this study is to support a spatially differentiated and demand-driven infrastructure development that ensures a desired coverage standard. For this purpose, we developed a calculation model which is applied to cumulated PEV sales and the inventory of publicly accessible charging points, in Germany with the spatial resolution of administrative districts. The required public charging-point evolution until 2040 is calculated for a given PEV market diffusion. In 2015, an appropriate coverage standard was achieved in only some regions of Germany; this means that the probability of finding access to a free public charging point at the desired time of charging is at least 90%. When one considers the entire country, however, it becomes clear that an additional 3600 publicly available charging points are needed. By 2040, the provision of approximately 730,000 public charging points could ensure an appropriate coverage standard for an estimated 17.8 million PEVs. The study results show that the rate of public charging-point deployment can decrease once PEV sales increase. The economically feasible operation of public charging infrastructure highly depends on the average utilization rate and it appears to be challenging to reach profitability by only selling the electricity.

[1]  Hua Cai,et al.  Optimal locations of electric public charging stations using real world vehicle travel patterns , 2015 .

[2]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for infrastructure investments for alternative fuel vehicles , 2013 .

[3]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Georg Bühler,et al.  The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles , 2012 .

[5]  Horst E. Friedrich,et al.  Optimizing battery sizes of plug-in hybrid and extended range electric vehicles for different user types , 2014 .

[6]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Is awareness of public charging associated with consumer interest in plug-in electric vehicles? , 2015 .

[7]  Fang He,et al.  Optimal deployment of public charging stations for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2013 .

[8]  Alois Kessler,et al.  Modelling the development of a regional charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in time and space , 2012 .

[9]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  An empirical analysis on the adoption of alternative fuel vehicles: The case of natural gas vehicles , 2007 .

[10]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany , 2016 .

[11]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  US residential charging potential for electric vehicles , 2013 .

[12]  S. F. Lienin,et al.  Model aided policy development for the market penetration of natural gas vehicles in Switzerland , 2006 .

[13]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Charging infrastructure planning for promoting battery electric vehicles: An activity-based approach using multiday travel data , 2014 .