Maternal socio-economic factors and the risk of low birth weight in Lithuania.

AIM To evaluate the importance of maternal socio-economic factors on the risk of low birth weight in Lithuania. MATERIAL AND METHODS The case-control study involved 851 newborns with low birth weight (<2500 g) (cases) and 851 newborns with normal weight (controls). Study was accomplished from 1st February, 2001 until 31st October, 2002 in six main maternity hospitals in Lithuania. Mothers of infants were interviewed on the first day after delivery using the structured questionnaire. The database was processed by the application of statistical package "SPSS for Windows v.10.0". RESULTS Young (<20 years) and older (35 years and older) maternal age, primary or basic education, being single, divorced or widowed, low income, living in rural area and unemployment before pregnancy and during pregnancy increased the risk to deliver low birth weight baby in univariate analysis. In logistic multivariable regression analysis, low education, low income and unemployment during pregnancy significantly increased risk of low birth weight--OR - 2.0, 1.7 and 1.6 respectively. Interaction between several unfavorable risk factors increased risk of low birth weight by 3.4-7.8 times, being the highest among mothers with low education, unstable marital status and low income. CONCLUSION Maternal unfavorable socio-economic factors increased the risk to deliver low birth weight baby.

[1]  A. Grjibovski,et al.  Socio-demographic determinants of poor infant outcome in north-west Russia. , 2002, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[2]  N. Sebire,et al.  The risks associated with pregnancy in women aged 35 years or older. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[3]  E. Keane,et al.  Trend analysis and socio-economic differentials in infant mortality in the Southern Health Board, Ireland (1988-1997). , 2000, Irish medical journal.

[4]  J. Olsen,et al.  Socioeconomic and work related determinants of pregnancy outcome in southern Thailand. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[5]  N. Matsaniotis,et al.  Sociodemographic determinants of low birthweight in Greece: a population study. , 1999, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[6]  P. Rantakallio,et al.  Low birth weight in China and Finland , 1998, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[7]  M. Heverly,et al.  Prenatal factors and birth outcomes in the public health service: a rural/urban comparison. , 1997, Research in nursing & health.

[8]  P. Gertler,et al.  Are clinical criteria just proxies for socioeconomic status? A study of low birth weight in Jamaica. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[9]  M. Cogswell,et al.  The influence of fetal and maternal factors on the distribution of birthweight. , 1995, Seminars in perinatology.

[10]  C. Power,et al.  Birth weight and later socioeconomic disadvantage: evidence from the 1958 British cohort study , 1994, BMJ.

[11]  B. Ganatra,et al.  Determinants of low birth weight: a community based prospective cohort study. , 1994, Indian pediatrics.

[12]  H. Atrash,et al.  Low birthweight and infant mortality in Puerto Rico. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[13]  M. Lypson,et al.  Interactive effect of race and marital status in low birthweight. , 1993, Ethnicity & disease.

[14]  H. R. Anderson,et al.  Marital status: association with social and economic circumstances, psychological state and outcomes of pregnancy. , 1992 .

[15]  D. Petitti,et al.  Employment and low birth weight in black women. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[16]  M S Kramer,et al.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. , 1987, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[17]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Work in pregnancy: its evolving relationship with perinatal outcome (a review). , 1986, Social science & medicine.