Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review

Online health information should meet the reading level for the general public (set at sixth-grade level). Readability is a key requirement for information to be helpful and improve quality of care. The authors conducted a systematic review to evaluate the readability of online health information in the United States and Canada. Out of 3743 references, the authors included 157 cross-sectional studies evaluating 7891 websites using 13 readability scales. The mean readability grade level across websites ranged from grade 10 to 15 based on the different scales. Stratification by specialty, health condition, and type of organization producing information revealed the same findings. In conclusion, online health information in the United States and Canada has a readability level that is inappropriate for general public use. Poor readability can lead to misinformation and may have a detrimental effect on health. Efforts are needed to improve readability and the content of online health information.

[1]  Jack Gilliland,et al.  The concept of readability , 1968 .

[2]  A. Harris,et al.  How to increase reading ability , 1940 .

[3]  John O. Elliott,et al.  A health literacy assessment of the National Epilepsy Foundation Web site , 2007, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[4]  Faisal Hanif,et al.  The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information , 2009, Informatics for health & social care.

[5]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Lynn Shaw,et al.  Tools to evaluate the quality of web health information. , 2009 .

[7]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. , 2003, Health promotion international.

[8]  Christian Köhler,et al.  What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet , 2003, AMIA.

[9]  Ray Pawson,et al.  RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[10]  G. Baird,et al.  Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses. , 2016, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  Clyde T Matava,et al.  Are Parents Getting it Right? A Survey of Parents’ Internet Use for Children’s Health Care Information , 2015, Interactive journal of medical research.

[12]  Health Domains for Sale: The Need for Global Health Internet Governance , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Daniela B. Friedman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer Information , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[14]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Googling endometriosis: a systematic review of information available on the Internet , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.