Long-term electrical resistivity monitoring of recharge-induced contaminant plume behavior.

Geophysical measurements, and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data in particular, are sensitive to properties that are related (directly or indirectly) to hydrological processes. The challenge is in extracting information from geophysical data at a relevant scale that can be used to gain insight about subsurface behavior and to parameterize or validate flow and transport models. Here, we consider the use of ERT data for examining the impact of recharge on subsurface contamination at the S-3 ponds of the Oak Ridge Integrated Field Research Challenge (IFRC) site in Tennessee. A large dataset of time-lapse cross-well and surface ERT data, collected at the site over a period of 12 months, is used to study time variations in resistivity due to changes in total dissolved solids (primarily nitrate). The electrical resistivity distributions recovered from cross-well and surface ERT data agrees well, and both of these datasets can be used to interpret spatiotemporal variations in subsurface nitrate concentrations due to rainfall, although the sensitivity of the electrical resistivity response to dilution varies with nitrate concentration. Using the time-lapse surface ERT data interpreted in terms of nitrate concentrations, we find that the subsurface nitrate concentration at this site varies as a function of spatial position, episodic heavy rainstorms (versus seasonal and annual fluctuations), and antecedent rainfall history. These results suggest that the surface ERT monitoring approach is potentially useful for examining subsurface plume responses to recharge over field-relevant scales.

[1]  Yu-Shu Wu,et al.  Geochemical and geophysical responses during the infiltration of fresh water into the contaminated saprolite of the Oak Ridge Integrated Field Research Challenge site, Tennessee , 2013 .

[2]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Evaluation of permeable reactive barrier (PRB) integrity using electrical imaging methods , 2003 .

[3]  Abelardo Ramirez,et al.  Electrical imaging of engineered hydraulic barriers , 2000 .

[4]  Roy F. Spalding,et al.  Occurrence of nitrate in groundwater-a review , 1993 .

[5]  Susan S. Hubbard,et al.  Development of a joint hydrogeophysical inversion approach and application to a contaminated fractured aquifer , 2006 .

[6]  Partha S. Routh,et al.  Time-lapse ERT monitoring of an injection/withdrawal experiment , 2006 .

[7]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA , 2011 .

[8]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Assessment of measurement errors for galvanic-resistivity electrodes of different composition , 2008 .

[9]  J. Chambers,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of DNAPL migration through a saturated porous medium using electrical impedance tomography. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[10]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Pilot-scale in situ bioremediation of uranium in a highly contaminated aquifer. 1. Conditioning of a treatment zone. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  A. Binley,et al.  Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods. , 1996 .

[12]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Saline tracer visualized with three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: Field‐scale spatial moment analysis , 2005 .

[13]  K. Singha,et al.  Imaging hyporheic zone solute transport using electrical resistivity , 2009 .

[14]  G. E. Archie.  The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[15]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Leaks in Storage Tanks using Electrical Resistance Tomography: Application at the Hanford Site , 2004 .

[16]  George V. Keller,et al.  Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting , 1981 .

[17]  J. Nitao,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement , 1992 .

[18]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[19]  L. Bentley,et al.  Low temperature dependence of electrical resistivity: Implications for near surface geophysical monitoring , 2007 .

[20]  A. Binley,et al.  A 3D ERT study of solute transport in a large experimental tank , 2002 .

[21]  Timothy Scheibe,et al.  Conceptual and numerical model of uranium(VI) reductive immobilization in fractured subsurface sediments. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[22]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Application of a hybrid MPI/OpenMP approach for parallel groundwater model calibration using multi-core computers , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations , 2005 .

[24]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Influence of natural time-dependent variations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurements , 2004 .

[25]  D. Solomon,et al.  Natural spatial and temporal variations in groundwater chemistry in fractured, sedimentary rocks: scale and implications for solute transport , 2005 .

[26]  D. K. Solomon,et al.  Status Report: A Hydrologic Framework for the Oak Ridge Reservation , 1992 .

[27]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Effects of nitrate on the stability of uranium in a bioreduced region of the subsurface. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Jinsong Chen,et al.  Stochastic estimation of aquifer geometry using seismic refraction data with borehole depth constraints , 2010 .

[29]  Susan S. Hubbard,et al.  3D induced-polarization data inversion for complex resistivity , 2011 .

[30]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models , 2002 .

[31]  Scott C. Brooks,et al.  Waste Characteristics of the Former S-3 Ponds and Outline of Uranium Chemistry Relevant to NABIR Field Research Center Studies , 2001 .

[32]  Stephen K. Park.  Fluid migration in the vadose zone from 3-D inversion of resistivity monitoring data , 1998 .

[33]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Coupled modeling of hydrogeochemical and electrical resistivity data for exploring the impact of recharge on subsurface contamination , 2011 .

[34]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Accounting for spatially variable resolution in electrical resistivity tomography through field-scale rock-physics relations , 2006 .

[35]  A. Binley,et al.  Monitoring snowmelt induced unsaturated flow and transport using electrical resistivity tomography , 2002 .

[36]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography. , 2000 .

[37]  James P. McNamara,et al.  Application of time-lapse ERT imaging to watershed characterization , 2008 .

[38]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography , 1993 .

[39]  A. Binley,et al.  Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging , 2001 .

[40]  D. A. Lietzke,et al.  Status Report on the Geology of the Oak Ridge Reservation , 1992 .

[41]  P. Jardine,et al.  Plume and lithologic profiling with surface resistivity and seismic tomography , 2005, Ground water.

[42]  Abelardo Ramirez,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography during in-situ trichloroethylene remediation at the Savannah River Site , 1995 .

[43]  A. Sato,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography , 2001 .

[44]  Stefan Uhlenbrook,et al.  Joint interpretation of hydrological and geophysical data: electrical resistivity tomography results from a process hydrological research site in the Black Forest Mountains, Germany , 2009 .

[45]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Difference Inversion of ERT Data: a Fast Inversion Method for 3-D In Situ Monitoring , 2001 .

[46]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Geochemical modeling of reactions and partitioning of trace metals and radionuclides during titration of contaminated acidic sediments. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.