Pimp Your Landscape: A Tool for Qualitative Evaluation of the Effects of Regional Planning Measures on Ecosystem Services

The article presents the platform “Pimp your landscape” (PYL), which aims firstly at the support of planners by simulating alternative land-use scenarios and by an evaluation of benefits or risks for regionally important ecosystem services. Second, PYL supports an integration of information on environmental and landscape conditions into impact assessment. Third, PYL supports the integration of impacts of planning measures on ecosystem services. PYL is a modified 2-D cellular automaton with GIS features. The cells have the major attribute “land-use type” and can be supplemented with additional information, such as specifics regarding geology, topography and climate. The GIS features support the delineation of non-cellular infrastructural elements, such as roads or water bodies. An evaluation matrix represents the core element of the system. In this matrix, values in a relative scale from 0 (lowest value) to 100 (highest value) are assigned to the land-use types and infrastructural elements depending on their effect on ecosystem services. The option to configure rules for describing the impact of environmental attributes and proximity effects on cell values and land-use transition probabilities is of particular importance. User interface and usage of the platform are demonstrated by an application case. Constraints and limits of the recent version are discussed, including the need to consider in the evaluation, landscape-structure aspects such as patch size, fragmentation and spatial connectivity. Regarding the further development, it is planned to include the impact of land management practices to support climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies in regional planning.

[1]  Fang Wang,et al.  Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land-use vector-based cellular automata model , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  Hedwig van Delden,et al.  Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Pimp Your Landscape - a Generic Approach for Integrating Regional Stakeholder Needs into Land Use Planning , 2010 .

[4]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[5]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  From Cellular Automata to Urban Models: New Principles for Model Development and Implementation , 1997 .

[6]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[7]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview , 2004 .

[8]  Reimund P. Rötter,et al.  Integration of Systems Network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Scenario analysis and management options for sustainable river basin management: Application of the Elbe DSS , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  H. G. Wind,et al.  From Design to Application of a Decision-support System for Integrated River-basin Management , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas Gaiser,et al.  Development of a regional model for integrated management of water resources at the basin scale , 2008 .

[12]  Felix Müller,et al.  Hierarchical approaches to ecosystem theory , 1992 .

[13]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  dinamica—a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier , 2002 .

[14]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions — the SENSOR approach , 2008 .

[15]  Lachlan T. H. Newham,et al.  Stakeholder participation in modelling for integrated catchment assessment and management: An Australian case study , 2007 .

[16]  Martin Volk,et al.  Integrated ecological-economic modelling of water pollution abatement management options in the Upper Ems River Basin , 2008 .

[17]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Decision Support Systems for implementing the European Water Framework Directive: The MULINO approach , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Martin Volk,et al.  How Can We Make Progress with Decision Support Systems in Landscape and River Basin Management? Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of Four Different Decision Support Systems , 2010, Environmental management.

[19]  Quang Bao Le,et al.  Land Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): A multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system: 2. Scenario-based application for impact assessment of land-use policies , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[20]  D. Petry Landscape function assessment and regional planning: Creating knowledge bases for sustainable landscape development , 2001 .

[21]  Guy Engelen,et al.  Cellular Automata as the Basis of Integrated Dynamic Regional Modelling , 1997 .

[22]  Justyna Czemiel Berndtsson,et al.  Influence of different activities on water quality in a small basin , 2006 .

[23]  Eila Turtola,et al.  Evaluating agri-environmental indicators (AEIs)—Use and limitations of international indicators at national level , 2007 .

[24]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? , 2000 .

[25]  J. Kros,et al.  Towards integrated national modelling with particular reference to the environmental effects of nutrients , 1998 .

[26]  E. Gaddis,et al.  Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners , 2008 .

[27]  Walter A.H. Rossing,et al.  Integrative modelling approaches for analysis of impact of multifunctional agriculture: A review for France, Germany and The Netherlands , 2007 .

[28]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability , 2008 .

[29]  Martin Volk,et al.  "Pimp your landscape" - an interactive land-use planning support tool , 2008 .

[30]  H. Pretzscha,et al.  The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA : construction , application and evaluation , 2002 .

[31]  Martin Volk,et al.  Meso-scale landscape analysis based on landscape balance investigations: problems and hierarchical approaches for their resolution , 2003 .

[32]  Don Wijewardana,et al.  Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: The road travelled and the way ahead , 2008 .

[33]  Sarah Davis,et al.  Complexity, land-use modeling, and the human dimension: Fundamental challenges for mapping unknown outcome spaces , 2008 .

[34]  P. Meire Integrated water management: practical experiences and case studies , 2008 .

[35]  Don C. Bragg,et al.  A hierarchical approach for simulating northern forest dynamics , 2004 .

[36]  Georgios Ch. Sirakoulis,et al.  A cellular automaton simulation tool for modelling seismicity in the region of Xanthi , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[37]  Andre Botequilha Leitão,et al.  Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning , 2002 .

[38]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended Constrained Cellular Automata land use model , 2009 .

[39]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Presentation of information for spatial decision support: a survey on the use of maps by participants in quantitative water management in the IJsselmeer region, the Netherlands , 2003 .

[40]  Quang Bao Le,et al.  Land-Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): A multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system. I. Structure and theoretical specification , 2008, Ecol. Informatics.

[41]  Gary Higgs,et al.  Using IT approaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: Prospects and challenges , 2008 .

[42]  Jörg Dietrich,et al.  Socioeconomic analysis within an interdisciplinary spatial decision support system for an integrated management of the Werra River Basin , 2005 .

[43]  Roger White,et al.  Urban systems dynamics and cellular automata: Fractal structures between order and chaos , 1994 .

[44]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  C. Bernhofer,et al.  Testing different decoupling coefficients with measurements and models of contrasting canopies and soil water conditions , 2008 .

[46]  E. Uuemaa,et al.  Scale dependence of landscape metrics and their indicatory value for nutrient and organic matter losses from catchments , 2005 .

[47]  Roger White,et al.  The Use of Constrained Cellular Automata for High-Resolution Modelling of Urban Land-Use Dynamics , 1997 .

[49]  C. Fürst,et al.  Regionalization of Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements Based on a Multiple Regression Approach , 2010 .

[50]  Martin Volk,et al.  Squaring the Circle? Combining Models, Indicators, Experts and End-Users in Integrated Land-Use Management Support Tools , 2010, Environmental management.

[51]  C. Lavalle,et al.  Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata , 2003 .

[52]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings for nanotechnology. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[53]  J. Farman,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 , 2002 .

[54]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Environmental decision support systems: Current issues, methods and tools , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[55]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services , 2006 .

[56]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  The forest vegetation simulator: A review of its structure, content, and applications , 2005 .

[57]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[58]  Martin Volk,et al.  Landscape Balance and Landscape Assessment , 2001 .

[59]  S. Polasky,et al.  Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services , 2007 .

[60]  Towards an Adaptive Approach in Planning and Management Process , 2008 .

[61]  Caspar J. M. Hewett,et al.  A multi-scale framework for strategic management of diffuse pollution , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[62]  P. Verburg,et al.  Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes , 2006 .

[63]  Xia Li,et al.  Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[64]  Jack C. Wileden,et al.  Strategies for landscape ecology: An application using cellular automata models , 2008 .

[65]  J. Roosaare,et al.  Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research , 2009 .

[66]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[67]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  A generic tool for optimising land-use patterns and landscape structures , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[68]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Progress in integrated assessment and modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[69]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessment of land use policies , 2008 .

[70]  Roger White,et al.  Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns , 1993 .