Friction Factor Measurement, Analysis, and Modeling for Flat-Plates with 12.15 mm Diameter Hole-Pattern, Tested with Air at Different Clearances, Inlet Pressures, and Pressure Ratios

Friction Factor Measurement, Analysis, and Modeling for Flat-Plates with 12.15 mm Diameter Hole-Pattern, Tested with Air at Different Clearances, Inlet Pressures, and Pressure Ratios. (December 2010) Thanesh Deva Asirvatham, B.E., Government College of Technology, Coimbatore-India Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Dara Childs Dr. Gerald Morrison Friction factor data are important for better prediction of leakage and rotordynamic coefficients of gas annular seals. A flat-plate test rig is used to determine friction factor of hole-pattern/honeycomb flat-plate surfaces representing annular seals. Three flat-plates, having a hole-pattern with hole diameter of 12.15 mm and hole depths of 0.9 mm, 1.9 mm, and 2.9 mm, are tested with air as the working medium. Air flow is produced between two surfaces, one having the holepattern roughness representing the hole-pattern seal and the other smooth, at the following three clearances of 0.254, 0.381, and 0.635 mm and three inlet pressures of 56, 70, and 84 bar with all possible pressure ratios at each configuration. The friction factor data are presented for all tested configurations, with description of the test rig and theory behind the calculations. The effect of hole diameter, hole depth, clearance, Reynolds number, and inlet pressure are analyzed, and friction factor models based on these parameters are calculated. Friction factor upset (an undesirable phenomenon making the test data non repeatable) is also explained.

[1]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling, and Analysis , 1993 .

[2]  John Charles Hess Dynamic pressure response of water flow between closely spaced roughened flat plates , 1993 .

[3]  Robert X. Perez,et al.  The Use Of Honeycomb Seals In Stabilizing Two Centrifugal Compressors. , 1993 .

[4]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Friction-Factor Data for Flat-Plate Tests of Smooth and Honeycomb Surfaces , 1992 .

[5]  G. G. Hirs A Bulk-Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricant Films , 1973 .

[6]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  A Comparison of Experimental Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage Characteristics Between Hole-Pattern Gas Damper Seals and a Honeycomb Seal , 1997 .

[7]  C. C. Nelson Analysis for leakage and rotordynamic coefficients of surface-roughened tapered annular gas seals , 1984 .

[8]  Villasmil Urdaneta,et al.  Parameters defining flow resistance and the friction factor behavior in liquid annular seals with deliberately roughened surfaces , 2006 .

[9]  Eric M. Kennedy,et al.  Friction factors for pipe flow of xanthan-based concentrates of fire fighting foams , 2005 .

[10]  Villasmil Urdaneta,et al.  Understanding the friction factor behavior in liquid annular seals with deliberately roughened surfaces, a CFD approach , 2002 .

[11]  Jonathan Leigh Wade Test versus predictions for rotordynamic coefficients and leakage rates of hole-pattern gas seals at two clearances in choked and unchoked conditions , 2004 .

[12]  T. Ha Rotordynamic analysis of annular honeycomb-stator turbulent gas seals using a new friction-factor model based on flat plate tests , 1992 .

[13]  Jay Armstrong,et al.  Turbine Instability Solution-Honeycomb Seals. , 1996 .

[14]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Vibration characteristics of the HPOTP (high-pressure oxygen turbopump) of the SSME (space shuttle main engine) , 1985 .

[15]  J. Frěne,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Textured “Damper” Annular Seals , 2006 .

[16]  Patrice Fayolle,et al.  Test Results for Liquid “Damper” Seals Using a Round-Hole Roughness Pattern for the Stators , 1999 .