Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility

This paper presents a decision model that captures supply-side disruption risks, social risks, and demand-side uncertainty within an integrated global supply chain and corporate social responsibility (CSR) modelling and analysis framework. The global supply chain decision-makers must decide on the level of investment in CSR activities and the choice of trading partners (manufacturer or retailer) given their CSR consciousness and perceived riskiness in order to maximise profit and minimise their overall risk. The model incorporates individual attitudes towards disruption risks among the manufacturers and the retailers, with the demands for the product associated with the retailers being random. The model allows one to investigate the effects of heterogeneous CSR activities in a global supply chain and to compute the resultant equilibrium pattern of product outputs, transactions, product prices, and levels of social responsibility activities. The results show that CSR activities can potentially be used to mitigate global supply chain risk.

[1]  David Ben-Arieh Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach , 2012 .

[2]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Dmytro Matsypura,et al.  Supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making , 2009 .

[4]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  John F. Muth,et al.  A RISK/RETURN PARADOX FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[6]  D. Bogataj,et al.  Measuring the supply chain risk and vulnerability in frequency space , 2007 .

[7]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms , 2007, Technometrics.

[8]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  Financial engineering of the integration of global supply chain networks and social networks with risk management , 2006 .

[9]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Bryan W. Husted,et al.  Risk Management, Real Options, Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[11]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  The Leadership Challenge: Building Resilient Corporate Reputations , 2005 .

[13]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[14]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives , 2004 .

[15]  Andreas Norrman,et al.  Ericsson’s Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management-approach After a Serious Supplier Accident , 2004 .

[16]  G. Zsidisin Managerial Perceptions of Supply Risk , 2003 .

[17]  M. Christopher,et al.  Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research , 2003 .

[18]  Debora L. Spar,et al.  The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business , 2003 .

[19]  Ans Kolk,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-regulation:: Corporate Codes of Conduct and Child Labour , 2002 .

[20]  Patrick M. Kreiser Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image, and Performance , 2002 .

[21]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age , 2002 .

[22]  John D. Benjamin,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2001 .

[23]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[24]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Learning from Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk from the Toy Industry , 2001 .

[25]  Magali A. Delmas,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing Environmental Voluntary Agreements , 2001 .

[26]  S. Seshadri,et al.  Risk intermediation in supply chains , 2000 .

[27]  Business and Society Review , 2000 .

[28]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk , 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .

[30]  Ronald J. Adams,et al.  The Apparel Industry Response to “Sweatshop” Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct , 1999 .

[31]  Bradley R. Agle,et al.  The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 1999 .

[32]  Larry R. Smeltzer,et al.  Proactive Supply Management: The Management of Risk , 1998 .

[33]  L. Preston,et al.  The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship , 1997 .

[34]  Peter A. Soyka,et al.  Does Improving a Firm's Environmental Management System and Environmental Performance Result in a Higher Stock Price? , 1997 .

[35]  K E Hill,et al.  Supply-Chain Dynamics, Environmental Issues, and Manufacturing Firms , 1997 .

[36]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[37]  A. Nagurney Financial Networks: Statics and Dynamics , 1997 .

[38]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Interactions between operational research and environmental management , 1995 .

[39]  J C Collins,et al.  Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies , 1994 .

[40]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  Dynamical systems and variational inequalities , 1993, Ann. Oper. Res..

[41]  J. Kotter,et al.  Corporate Culture and Performance , 1992 .

[42]  Harvey E. Wagner The Open Corporation , 1991 .

[43]  David Swindley UK Retailers and Global Responsibility , 1990 .

[44]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[45]  F. Zagare N-Person Games , 1984 .

[46]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[47]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.