The Application of the Data Envelopment Analysis for Tourism Website Evaluation

Tourists are increasingly using the Internet for travel preparation and booking. At the same time tourism organizations are facing increased competition regarding their website offers. Therefore, the aim for tourism organizations and businesses should be to provide more efficient websites in order to gain competitive advantage. This study provides an example of how Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) can be used to assess the website’s efficiency of tourism organizations. Input criteria include the linguistic offer, interactivity, and tourism content, and output is defined by number of inquiries and number of website visits. It is argued that efficient organizations should be considered useful benchmarking partners for inefficient organizations in that best practices should be used to identify the potential for improvement.

[1]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  Dennis Reynolds.  An Exploratory Investigation of Multiunit Restaurant Productivity Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2004 .

[3]  Kelsey L. Johnson,et al.  Benchmarking: a tool for Web site evaluation and improvement , 1999, Internet Res..

[4]  Thomas Feil,et al.  Benchmarking Information and Communication Applications for the Purpose of Marketing and Sales in the Tourism Sector , 2002, ENTER.

[5]  Arno Scharl,et al.  Quantitive evaluation of Web site content and structure , 2000, Internet Res..

[6]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  Using the DEA methodology to rank software technical efficiency , 2005, CACM.

[7]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  E-commerce Site Evaluation: a Case Study , 2000, EC-Web.

[8]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Juline E. Mills,et al.  Where Are We Now? An Initial Analysis of Web-based Marketing Issues Affecting Travel and Tourism , 2002, ENTER.

[10]  Cristian Morosan,et al.  Understanding Travelers' Adoption of Hotel Reservation Web sites , 2006, ENTER.

[11]  Maria Lexhagen,et al.  Reduction of Perceived Risk through On-line Value-Added Services Offered on Tourism Businesses Web-sites , 2002, ENTER.

[12]  Simon Hudson,et al.  A destination case study of marketing tourism online: Banff, Canada , 2002 .

[13]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  The future eTourism intermediaries , 2002 .

[14]  P. Tierney.  Internet-Based Evaluation of Tourism Web Site Effectiveness: Methodological Issues and Survey Results , 2000 .

[15]  Zhaohua Deng,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of tourism e-commerce websites in China , 2007 .

[16]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Multimedia, Hypertext und Internet , 1996 .

[17]  Richard Butler,et al.  Perceptions of Marketing Managers of the Effectiveness of the Internet in Tourism and Hospitality , 2000, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[18]  Hwiman Chung,et al.  Effects of Perceived Interactivity on Web Site Preference and Memory: Role of Personal Motivation , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Approach to Destination Benchmarking , 2004 .

[20]  Marianna Sigala.  Investigating the ICT Productivity Paradox: Evidence from the UK Hotel Sector , 2002, ENTER.

[21]  Alastair M. Morrison,et al.  East versus West: A comparison of online destination marketing in China and the USA , 2004 .

[22]  Juline E. Mills,et al.  Measuring Customer Satisfaction with Online Travel , 2003, ENTER.

[23]  Jane Klobas,et al.  User developed applications and information systems success , 2003 .

[24]  SpinkAmanda,et al.  How are we searching the world wide web , 2006 .

[25]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean's Model , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[26]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  A taxonomy for data envelopment analysis , 2004 .

[27]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[28]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Benchmarking marketing productivity using data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[29]  Virginia Cano,et al.  Opportunities for endearment to place through electronic ‘visiting’: WWW homepages and the tourism promotion of Scotland , 1998 .

[30]  Solomon Negash,et al.  The moderating effect of on-line experience on the antecedents and consequences of on-line satisfaction , 2005 .

[31]  Marianna Sigala,et al.  ICT Paradox Lost? A Stepwise DEA Methodology to Evaluate Technology Investments in Tourism Settings , 2004 .

[32]  Alastair G. Smith,et al.  Applying evaluation criteria to New Zealand government websites , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[34]  Ebba Þóra Hvannberg,et al.  Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[35]  Marianna Sigala,et al.  ICT paradox lost? A stepwise DEA methodology , 2004 .

[36]  M. Sigala.  Developing and Benchmarking Internet Marketing Strategies in the Hotel Sector in Greece , 2003 .

[37]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[38]  L. Cai,et al.  Hotel Labor Productivity Assessment , 2004 .

[39]  S. Weinberg,et al.  Where We Are Now , 1973, Science.

[40]  Myra Spiliopoulou,et al.  Web usage mining for Web site evaluation , 2000, CACM.

[41]  Peter Bodorik,et al.  Developing Internet E-Commerce Benchmarks , 1999, Inf. Syst..

[42]  Shiuh-Nan Hwang,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial efficiency change in Taiwan , 2003 .

[43]  Paul Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Intentions to Adopt Electronic Commerce - Incorporating Trust and Risk in the Technology Acceptance Model , 2001 .

[44]  K. Wöber.  Efficiency Measures in Benchmarking Decision Support Systems: A Hotel Industry Application , 2000 .

[45]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Prototype Testing for a Destination Recommender System: Steps, Procedures and Implications , 2004, ENTER.

[46]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial web site , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN MOTIVATIONS FOR ONLINE RETAIL SHOPPING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[48]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Marketing strategies for European museums. An inter-city comparison by means of advanced benchmarking methodologies. , 2002 .

[50]  Gitte Lindgaard.  Usability testing and system evaluation - a guide for designing useful computer systems , 1994, Chapman and Hall computing series.

[51]  Amanda Spink,et al.  How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[52]  Arno Scharl,et al.  Evolutionary Web Development , 2000, Applied Computing.

[53]  Holger Scheel.  EMS: Efficiency Measurement System User’s Manual , 2000 .

[54]  K. Wöber.  Benchmarking in tourism and hospitality industries : the selection of benchmarking partners , 2002 .

[55]  Dennis J. Sweeney,et al.  Study guide to accompany an introduction to management science : quantitative approaches to decision making , 1985 .

[56]  Cecilio Mar-Molinero,et al.  Measuring DEA efficiency in Internet companies , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[57]  B. Doolin,et al.  Evaluating the use of the Web for tourism marketing: a case study from New Zealand , 2002 .