Assay interferences from blood collection tubes: a cautionary note.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. G. Wood,et al. Immobilisation of Antibodies and Antigens on Macro Solid Phases — A Comparison Between Adsorptive and Covalent Binding. A critical study of macro solid phases for use in immunoassay systems, Part I , 1983, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.
[2] R. Laessig,et al. Comparison of plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator (SST) blood-drawing tubes for common clinical chemistry determinations. , 1992, Clinical chemistry.
[3] M. Landt,et al. A new plastic evacuated tube with plasma separator , 1995, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.
[4] G. Hortin,et al. Effect of blood collection tubes on total triiodothyronine and other laboratory assays. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.
[5] G. Hortin,et al. Immunoassay interference by a commonly used blood collection tube additive, the organosilicone surfactant silwet L-720. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.
[6] Jason Y. Park,et al. Processing controls in blood collection tubes reveals interference. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.
[7] C. Selby,et al. Interference in Immunoassay , 1999, Annals of clinical biochemistry.
[8] A. D. Leener,et al. Evaluation of a new generation of plastic evacuated blood-collection tubes in clinical chemistry, therapeutic drug monitoring, hormone and trace metal analysis , 2004, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.