Continuous Improvement and Competitive Pressure in the Presence of Discrete Innovation

Does competitive pressure foster innovation? Technical progress consists of numerous small improvements made upon the existing technology continuous improvement and innovative activities aiming at entirely new technology (discrete innovation). Continuous improvement is often of limited relevance to the new technology invented by successful discrete innovation. By capturing this interplay, our model predicts that, in contrast to previous theoretical findings, an increase in competitive pressure measured by product substitutability may decrease firms' incentives to conduct continuous improvement. Continuous improvement had been regarded as an important source of strength in Japanese manufacturing until the 1980s. However, several studies have found that levels of continuous improvement have recently decreased in a number of Japanese manufacturing firms. Through field research at two Japanese firms, we demonstrate the real-world relevance and usefulness of the model which offers new insights on possible mechanisms behind the declining focus on continuous improvement in Japan.

[1]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[2]  Tom Lee,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation , 1980 .

[3]  Jerry R. Green,et al.  On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation , 1995 .

[4]  Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Darren Filson The Nature and Effects of Technological Change over the Industry Life Cycle , 2001 .

[6]  J. Clarke,et al.  Superconducting quantum bits , 2008, Nature.

[7]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[8]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[9]  W. Bentley MacLeod,et al.  Worker Cooperation and the Ratchet Effect , 2000, Journal of Labor Economics.

[10]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[11]  P. Tandon Innovation, Market Structure, and Welfare , 1984 .

[12]  Jean-Etienne de Bettignies Product market competition and boundaries of the firm , 2004 .

[13]  Souresh Saha,et al.  Consumer preferences and product and process R&D , 2007 .

[14]  Jennifer F. Reinganum A DYNAMIC GAME OF R AND D: PATENT PROTECTION AND COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR' , 1982 .

[15]  X. Vives Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools , 1999 .

[16]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[17]  Takao Kato The Recent Transformation of Participatory Employment Practices in Japan , 2000 .

[18]  X. Vives,et al.  Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly , 1984 .

[19]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity , 1980 .

[20]  Jennifer F. Reinganum Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1985 .

[21]  C. Ahmadjian,et al.  Stability and change in embedded relationships: Broken ties in Japanese automotive keiretsu , 2005 .

[22]  S. Nickell Competition and Corporate Performance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  A MODEL OF DUOPOLY SUGGESTING A THEORY OF ENTRY BARRIERS , 1978 .

[24]  Dale T. Mortensen,et al.  Property Rights and Efficiency in Mating, Racing, and Related Games , 1982 .

[25]  S. Salop Monopolistic competition with outside goods , 1979 .

[26]  S. Athey,et al.  Product and Process Flexibility in an Innovative Environment , 1995 .

[27]  P. Aghion,et al.  On the Welfare Effects and Political Economy of Competition-Enhancing Policies , 2003 .

[28]  S. Redding,et al.  Path Dependence, Endogenous Innovation, and Growth , 2002 .

[29]  Takao Kato,et al.  Worker discontent, voice, and EI programs in Japan: Evidence from the Japanese worker representation and participation survey , 2005 .

[30]  Michael Raith,et al.  Competition, Risk and Managerial Incentives , 2001 .

[31]  Simon Kuznets,et al.  Inventive Activity: Problems of Definition and Measurement , 1962 .

[32]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Long Waves and Short Waves: Growth Through Intensive and Extensive Search , 1990 .

[33]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: the story of Hewlett‐Packard's thermal ink‐jet , 2002 .

[34]  D. Gregori,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[35]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[36]  Howard F. Chang,et al.  Patent Scope, Antitrust Policy, and Cumulative Innovation , 1995 .

[37]  P. Howitt,et al.  Research and development in the growth process , 1996 .

[38]  Armin Schmutzler,et al.  Is there a U-shaped relation between competition and investment? , 2011 .

[39]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[40]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[41]  George Hendrikse,et al.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1989 .

[42]  M. Spence Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance , 1984 .

[43]  G. Grossman,et al.  Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth , 1989 .

[44]  Jennifer Baggs,et al.  Product Market Competition and Agency Costs , 2006 .

[45]  E. Mansfield Research and innovation in the modern corporation , 1972 .

[46]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[47]  H. Hotelling Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[48]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  Work, Mobility, and Participation: A Comparative Study of American and Japanese Industry , 1979 .

[49]  X. Vives Innovation and Competitive Pressure , 2004 .

[50]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[51]  Jennifer F. Reinganum The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion , 1989 .

[52]  Jan Boone,et al.  Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation , 2000 .

[53]  Paul Geroski,et al.  INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1990 .