A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in

I thank the interviewed organizational members for their assistance and patience and Jonathon Blake, Roxanne Jones-Toler, Keith Murnighan, and Keith Weigelt for their assistance on this paper. This paper presents a multifaceted qualitative investigation of everyday conflict in six organizational work teams. Repeated interviews and on-site observations provide data on participants' perceptions, behaviors, and their own analyses of their conflicts, resulting in a generalized conflict model. Model evaluation indicates that relationship conflict is detrimental to performance and satisfaction; process conflict is also detrimental to performance; and task conflict's effects on performance depend on specified dimensions. In particular, emotionality reduces effectiveness, resolution potential and acceptability norms increase effectiveness, and importance accentuates conflict's other effects. Groups with norms that accept task but not relationship conflict are most effective. The model and the findings help to broaden understanding of dynamics of organizational conflict and suggest ways it can either be alleviated or wisely encouraged.'

[1]  Hapax Legomenon II: Theory, a Thesaurus, and Word Frequency , 1993 .

[2]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  Conflicts: Productive and Destructive* , 1969 .

[3]  M. Freedman,et al.  The Functions of Social Conflict , 1959 .

[4]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Just a Mirage: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research , 1989 .

[5]  L. Thompson,et al.  Group negotiation: Effects of decision rule, agenda, and aspiration. , 1988 .

[6]  L. Weingart.  Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[7]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task , 1993 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[9]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Rights and responsibilities of dissent: Cooperative conflict , 1991 .

[10]  Victor D. Wall,et al.  Perceptions of Inequity, Satisfaction, and Conflict in Task-Oriented Groups , 1986 .

[11]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[12]  Linda E. Ginzel.  The Impact of Biased Inquiry Strategies on Performance Judgments , 1994 .

[13]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  The impact of intragroup conflict on effectiveness: A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of conflict. , 1992 .

[14]  M. Bougon.  Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. , 1977 .

[15]  Robin L. Pinkley,et al.  Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. , 1990 .

[16]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. , 1992 .

[17]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Effects of Consensus and Devill's Advocacy On Strategic Decision‐Making , 1993 .

[18]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[19]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[20]  C. Dreu,et al.  OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE BY CONFLICT STIMULATION , 1994 .

[21]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  An examination of the psychometric properties of measures of negative affect in the PANAS-X scales. , 1993 .

[22]  H. Becker,et al.  The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research , 1978 .

[23]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups , 1954 .

[24]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[25]  R. Zajonc.  On the primacy of affect. , 1984 .

[26]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  RESOLVING THE PARADOX OF CONFLICT, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[27]  T. Tyler,et al.  Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. , 1996 .

[28]  A. Pettigrew.  The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[29]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[30]  Kenneth H. Price,et al.  Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making , 1991 .

[31]  R. Ryan,et al.  EMOTIONS IN NONDIRECTED TEXT LEARNING , 1990 .

[32]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[33]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review , 1980 .

[34]  J. Werbel,et al.  Universalistic and Contingency Predictions of Employee Satisfaction and Conflict. , 1979 .

[35]  K. Thomas.  Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. , 1992 .

[36]  Martin Euwema,et al.  Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior , 1995 .

[37]  K. Burstin,et al.  Contrastive Vignette Technique: An indirect Methodology Designed to Address Reactive Social Attitude Measurement1 , 1980 .

[38]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[39]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[40]  R. Lazarus.  Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. , 1982 .

[41]  R. A. Cosier,et al.  Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance , 1977 .

[42]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[43]  W. Hays.  Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings. 2nd ed. , 1985 .

[44]  L. Pondy.  Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. , 1967 .

[45]  Boris Kabanoff,et al.  Potential influence structures as sources of interpersonal conflict in groups and organizations , 1985 .

[46]  G. Johnson,et al.  Validating A Method for Mapping Managers' Mental Models of Competitive Industry Structures , 1995 .

[47]  Dianna Shandy,et al.  The Cultural Experience: Ethnography in Complex Society , 1988 .

[48]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[49]  W. Whyte.  Learning from the field , 1984 .

[50]  E. Weldon,et al.  Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  J. Russell.  Evidence of Convergent Validity on the Dimensions of Affect , 1978 .

[52]  J. Russell,et al.  Fuzzy concepts in a fuzzy hierarchy: varieties of anger. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  F. Fiedler.  The Contingency Model and the Dynamics of the Leadership Process1 , 1978 .

[54]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes , 1964 .

[55]  Workplace homicide: A time for action , 1995 .

[56]  B. Brehmer.  Social Judgment Theory and the Analysis of Interpersonal Conflict. , 1976 .

[57]  H. Hollingworth.  Personality a psychological interpretation. , 1938 .