Combining group facilitation, decision modeling, and information technology to improve the accuracy of group judgment

Interacting groups fail to make judgments as accurate as those of their most capable members due to problems associated with both interaction processes and cognitive processing. Group process techniques and decision analytic tools have been used with groups to combat these problems. While such techniques and tools do improve the quality of group judgment, they have not enabled groups to make judgments more accurate than those of their most capable members. A new intervention procedure that integrates group facilitation, decision modeling and information technology was developed to overcome more fully the problems typically associated with interaction processes and cognitive processing. An experiment involving 16 four- and five-member groups was conducted to test this intervention process. Results indicated that the process intervention enabled small, interacting groups to perform significantly better than their most capable members on two cognitive conflict tasks (p<.05).<<ETX>>

[1]  B. Brehmer.  Social Judgment Theory and the Analysis of Interpersonal Conflict. , 1976 .

[2]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Decision Modeling: Tools for Strategic Thinking , 1991 .

[3]  Tim Smithin,et al.  Judgement and Choice, 2nd Edition , 1988 .

[4]  Joel Harmon,et al.  Social judgment analysis and small group decision making: Cognitive feedback effects on individual and collective performance , 1990 .

[5]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[6]  K. R. Hammond,et al.  Cognitive conflict between persons: Application of the “lens model” paradigm , 1966 .

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[8]  S. C. Johnson.  Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[9]  Leslie B. Hammer,et al.  Task information, cognitive information, or functional validity information: Which components of cognitive feedback affect performance?☆ , 1992 .

[10]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Observations on GDSS interaction: chauffeured, facilitated, and user-driven systems , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[11]  D. Bunn,et al.  Interaction of judgemental and statistical forecasting methods: issues & , 1991 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[13]  E. Brunswik.  Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.

[14]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Group Productivity and Process: Pure and Mixed Reward Structures and Task Interdependence. , 1980 .

[15]  T. R. Stewart.  A Decomposition of the Correlation Coefficient and its Use in Analyzing Forecasting Skill , 1990 .

[16]  William K. Balzer,et al.  Reliability of actual and predicted judgments across time , 1983 .

[17]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique. , 1979 .

[18]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..

[20]  M. Doherty,et al.  Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. , 1989 .

[21]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique , 1981 .

[22]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Suppressing the contribution of the group's best member: is GDSS use appropriate for all group tasks? , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  R. Keeney,et al.  Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions , 1990 .

[24]  L. Phillips.  A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[25]  T. R. Stewart,et al.  10 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY , 1975 .

[26]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Revision, Weighting, and commitment in consensus group judgment , 1990 .

[27]  John Keltner,et al.  Facilitation Catalyst for Group Problem Solving , 1989 .

[28]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation in an electronic meeting environment , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[30]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[31]  Anne T. McCartt,et al.  Evaluating group decision support system effectiveness: A performance study of decision conferencing , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  R. John,et al.  A criterion validation of multiattribute utility analysis and of group communication strategy , 1980 .

[33]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .