Studies of protection and recovery techniques of diagnostic mirrors for ITER

In optical diagnostic systems of ITER, mirrors will be used to guide the light from plasma towards detectors and cameras. The mirrors will be subjected to erosion due to fast particles and to deposition of impurities from the plasma which will affect adversely the mirror reflectivity and therefore must be suppressed or mitigated at the maximum possible extent. Predictive modeling envisages the successful suppression of deposition in the diagnostic ducts with fins trapping the impurities on their way towards mirrors located in the end of these ducts. To validate modeling predictions, cylindrical and cone-shaped diagnostic ducts were exposed in TEXTOR for 3960 s of plasma operation. After exposure, no drastic suppression of deposition was observed in the cylindrical ducts with fins. At the same time, no detectable deposition was found on the mirrors located at the end of cone-shaped ducts outlining the advantages of the cone geometry. Analyses of exposure provide evidence that the contamination of exposed mirrors was due to wall conditioning discharges and not due to working plasma exposure. Cleaning by plasma sputtering was performed on molybdenum mirrors pre-coated with a 100 nm thick aluminum film. Aluminum was used as a proxy of beryllium. During exposure in electron cyclotron resonance-generated helium plasma, the entire coating was sputtered within nine hours, leaving no trace of aluminum and leading to the full recovery of the specular reflectivity without detrimental effects on the mirror surface.

[1]  M. Wisse,et al.  Laser damage thresholds of ITER mirror materials and first results on in situ laser cleaning of stainless steel mirrors , 2012, 1211.5360.

[2]  Alan E. Costley Requirements and Issues in Diagnostics for Next Step Burning Plasma Experiments , 2002 .

[3]  V. Zaveriaev,et al.  ITER R&D: Auxiliary Systems: Plasma Diagnostics , 2001 .

[4]  H. Esser,et al.  TOMAS - A Toroidal Magnetized Plasma Facility for Studying Wall Conditioning of Future Fusion Devices , 2001 .

[5]  R. Doerner,et al.  Simultaneous imaging/reflectivity measurements to assess diagnostic mirror cleaning. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[6]  C. Gil,et al.  Analyses of metallic first mirror samples after long term plasma exposure in Tore Supra , 2006 .

[7]  Optical properties of Al mirrors under impact of deuterium plasma ions in experiments simulating ITER conditions , 2009 .

[8]  A. N. Shapoval,et al.  Changes to the reflectance of Be mirrors due to deuterium plasmas contaminated with oxygen , 2010 .

[9]  A. Loarte,et al.  Analysis of performance of the optimized divertor in ITER , 2009 .

[10]  K. Kawahata,et al.  Studies of reflectivity degradation of retroreflectors in LHD and mitigation of impurity deposition using shaped diagnostic ducts and protective windows , 2012 .

[11]  V. S. Voitsenya,et al.  First studies of ITER-diagnostic mirrors in a tokamak with an all-metal interior: results of the first mirror test in ASDEX Upgrade , 2013 .

[12]  V. Philipps,et al.  Development of in situ cleaning techniques for diagnostic mirrors in ITER , 2011 .

[13]  Arkadi Kreter,et al.  Deposition and re-erosion studies by means of local impurity injection in TEXTOR , 2011 .

[14]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX): design and physics results , 2012 .

[15]  D. Reiter,et al.  The EIRENE and B2-EIRENE Codes , 2005 .

[16]  Giuseppe Gorini,et al.  Advanced Diagnostics for Magnetic and Inertial Fusion , 2002 .

[17]  V. N. Gorshkov,et al.  First mirrors in ITER: material choice and deposition prevention/cleaning techniques , 2011 .

[18]  Andrey Litnovsky,et al.  Passive protection of the ITER diagnostic mirrors , 2011 .