Refractory period prolongation by biphasic defibrillator waveforms is associated with enhanced sodium current in a computer model of the ventricular action potential

Mechanisms through which biphasic waveforms lower defibrillation threshold are unknown. Previous work showed that low-intensity biphasic shocks (BS2), delivered during the refractory period of a control action potential (S1), produced significantly longer responses than monophasic shocks (MS2). To test the hypothesis that longer responses are due to hyperpolarization-induced excitation channel recovery during the first portion of the biphasic waveform, the authors used the Beeler-Reuter ventricular action potential computer model with the Drouhard-Roberge (BRDR) modification to study refractory period stimulation with MS2 (10 msec) and symmetrical BS2 (10 msec each pulse). At 1.5 times diastolic threshold, BS2 prolonged action potential duration when delivered 50 msec into the S1 refractory period, and produced a maximum BS2 versus MS2 response duration difference of 62 msec. Longer BS2 responses corresponded to enhanced BS2-induced sodium current compared to MS2. Maximum BS2 vs MS2 sodium current difference was 400 uA/cm/sup 2/. These results show that, in a computer model of the ventricular action potential, hyperpolarization by the first phase of a biphasic waveform enhances S2 sodium current and prolongs duration of refractory-period responses. This effectively shortens the cellular refractory period. Prolonged refractory period responses, produced by biphasic defibrillator waveforms, may underlie enhanced defibrillating efficacy at low shock intensities.<<ETX>>

[1]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Stimulation of Spheroidal Cells - The Role of Cell Shape , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  George A. Johnson,et al.  A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Jones,et al.  Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts. , 1991, Circulation research.

[4]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Increasing fibrillation duration enhances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator waveform efficacy. , 1990, Circulation research.

[5]  J. Jones,et al.  Threshold reduction with biphasic defibrillator waveforms. Role of excitation channel recovery in a computer model of the ventricular action potential. , 1990, Journal of electrocardiology.

[6]  L Tung,et al.  Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[7]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Characterization of Refractory Period Extension by Transcardiac Shock , 1991, Circulation.

[8]  F. Roberge,et al.  Simulation Of The Effects Of Extracellular Shocks On Single Ventricular Cells , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[9]  R. Bing,et al.  Transmembrane electrical potentials in ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. , 1959, American heart journal.

[10]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Characterization of Ventricular Fibrillation Based on Monophasic Action Potential Morphology in the Human Heart , 1993, Circulation.

[11]  R. Winkle,et al.  Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. , 1989, American heart journal.

[12]  E. Fain,et al.  Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveform. , 1989, American heart journal.

[13]  S. Rush,et al.  Local potential gradients as a unifying measure for thresholds of stimulation, standstill, tachyarrhythmia and fibrillation appearing after strong capacitor discharges. , 1978, Advances in cardiology.

[14]  P D Wolf,et al.  Response of Relatively Refractory Canine Myocardium to Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks , 1991, Circulation.

[15]  R E Ideker,et al.  Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. , 1993, Circulation research.

[16]  G. W. Beeler,et al.  Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  D P Zipes,et al.  Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  Periodic Conductivity as a Mechanism for Cardiac Stimulation and Defibrillation , 1987 .

[19]  R E Jones,et al.  Improved cardiac cell excitation with symmetrical biphasic defibrillator waveforms. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  F A Roberge,et al.  Revised formulation of the Hodgkin-Huxley representation of the sodium current in cardiac cells. , 1987, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[21]  J. Jones,et al.  Dysfunction and safety factor strength-duration curves for biphasic defibrillator waveforms. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[23]  S. Rush,et al.  A Practical Algorithm for Solving Dynamic Membrane Equations , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Schuder,et al.  Superiority of biphasic shocks in the defibrillation of dogs by epicardial patches and catheter electrodes. , 1989, American heart journal.

[25]  Effects Of Monophasic Defibrillator Waveform Intensity On Graded Response Duration In A Computer Simulation Of The Ventricular Action Potential , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[26]  J. Spear,et al.  Patterns of Ventricular Activity During Catheter Defibrillation , 1974, Circulation.