Second Thoughts, Second Feelings: Attenuating the Impact of Threatening Narratives Through Rational Reappraisal

Two experiments tested hypotheses, derived from dual-process theory frameworks, concerning the attenuating effects of analytic system activation on emotion and cognitive judgments made after exposure to threatening narratives. In Experiment 1, after reading an emotionally intense news story, those whose rational system was activated by evaluating the story’s probative value reported less intense emotions than those whose rational system was not so activated. Reporting emotional responses to the story before or after making probative value judgments had no effect on the probative value judgments. In Experiment 2, rationally activated individuals reported less intense emotions than those who were activated experientially by listing emotions experienced by the story’s victim. Rational system activation also significantly reduced estimates of the problem’s seriousness and victimization risk relative to both those who were experientially activated and those who were not explicitly activated. The asymmetrical impact of the rational and experiential systems on affective and cognitive judgments is discussed in terms of the dynamic interaction between the two processing systems.

[1]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[2]  R. Schank,et al.  Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story , 1995 .

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research , 1999 .

[4]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory. , 1998 .

[5]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exemplification Theory of Media Influence , 2002 .

[6]  G. Gigerenzer.  Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious , 2007 .

[7]  John L. Pollock,et al.  OSCAR: a general theory of rationality , 1990, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[8]  J. Kelso,et al.  The Complementary Nature , 2006 .

[9]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. , 2004, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[10]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Two Decades of Cultivation Research: An Appraisal and Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[11]  W. James Potter,et al.  Perceived reality in television effects research , 1988 .

[12]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive-experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony. , 2007, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[13]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  Head Over the Heart or Heart Over the Head? Cognitive Experiential Self‐Theory and Extralegal Heuristics in Juror Decision Making1 , 2002 .

[14]  S. Chaiken.  The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[15]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[16]  Robin L. Nabi.  Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: a test of the cognitive-functional model , 2002 .

[17]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[18]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[19]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[20]  D. Myers.  Intuition: Its Powers and Perils , 2002 .

[21]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion , 2003, Commun. Res..

[22]  J. J. Strange,et al.  How Anecdotal Accounts in News and in Fiction Can Influence Judgments of a Social Problem’s Urgency, Causes, and Cures , 1999 .

[23]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[24]  P. Soukup.  Political Communication , 2002 .

[25]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[26]  Power Beyond Reckoning An Introduction to Narrative Impact , 2003 .

[27]  S. Epstein.  Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory of Personality , 2003 .

[28]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. , 2012 .

[29]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Gender, Rationality, and Base-Rate Explanations for Increasing Trends , 2003, Commun. Res..

[30]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  Applying a Cognitive-Processing Model to Presidential Debate Effects: Postdebate News Analysis and Primed Reflection , 2007 .

[31]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[32]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[33]  Richard Jackson Harris,et al.  A cognitive psychology of mass communication , 1989 .

[34]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Psychological Processes Underlying Cultivation Effects Further Tests of Construct Accessibility , 1996 .

[35]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  How Fictional Tales Wag Real-World Beliefs Models and Mechanisms of Narrative Influence , 2003 .

[36]  Robin L. Nabi.  Reasoning through emotion: An explication and test of a cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall , 1999 .

[37]  Maxim J. Schlossberg,et al.  A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication. , 1990 .

[38]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief , 2003, Cognition.

[39]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World , 2000 .

[40]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Slippery Slopes to Apprehension: , 2005, Commun. Res..

[41]  Tony Osborne.  A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication, 4th Ed , 2007 .

[42]  J. A. Scott Kelso.  7 The Complementary Nature of Coordination Dynamics: Toward a Science of the In-Between , 2005 .

[43]  L. Shrum.  Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect , 2001 .

[44]  S. Levinson.  Interactional biases in human thinking , 1995 .

[45]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[46]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[47]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Social cognition and cultivation. , 2007 .

[48]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[50]  Ronald D. Fricker,et al.  Cognition and Chance: The Psychology of Probabilistic Reasoning , 2005, Technometrics.

[51]  R. Hogarth.  Deciding Analytically or Trusting your Intuition? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Analytic and Intuitive Thought , 2002 .

[52]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive–experiential self-theory. , 1999 .

[53]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[54]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  Dean E. Hewes.  Cognitive processing of problematic messages: Reinterpreting to "unbias" messages , 1994 .

[56]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[57]  James J. Bradac,et al.  On Generalizing Cabbages, Messages, Kings, and Several Other Things: The Virtues of Multiplicity , 1983 .

[58]  From Television Forms to Genre Schemata: Children's Perceptions of Television Reality , 1993 .

[59]  Dean E. Hewes,et al.  Second-Guessing Theory: Review and Extension , 1989 .