A procedure for estimating the changes in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities and asymptotic directions at low and middle latitudes during periods of enhanced geomagnetic activity

A procedure is presented for estimating the changes in the cosmic ray cutoff rigidity and the asymptotic directions during geomagnetically active time periods at low- and mid-latitude locations. At a specific location the change in the rigidity associated with the first discontinuity in asymptotic longitude, ΔR1, and the equivalent changes in the other cutoff rigidity parameters can be related to the weighted sum of the changes in the horizontal component of the equatorial surface magnetic field, ΔHeq, sampled at intervals of 1 hour in local time from 0000 to 0700 to the east of the specified location. A set of generalized weighting factors is given for eight cutoff rigidity values in the range from 3 to 13.5 GV. For a cosmic ray particle having a rigidity R the asymptotic direction of approach during perturbed conditions corresponds in good approximation to the asymptotic direction of a particle with rigidity R − ΔR1 propagating through the quiescent geomagnetic field. Asymptotic directions during geomagnetically active periods can therefore be derived from the asymptotic directions computed in a quiescent geomagnetic field model after the associated change in the cutoff rigidity has been deduced from ground-based magnetometer data. The basic principles of the procedure are demonstrated for the cosmic ray station Jungfraujoch, Switzerland.

[1]  D. J. Cooke,et al.  Re-evaluation of cosmic-ray cutoff terminology , 1985 .

[2]  M. Shea,et al.  The effect of local perturbations of the geomagnetic field on cosmic ray cutoff rigidities at Jungfraujoch and Kiel , 1983 .

[3]  M. Shea,et al.  Procedure for Estimating the Change in Asymptotic Directions at a Mid-Latitude Cosmic Ray Station Resulting from a Local Change in Cosmic Ray Cutoff Rigidity , 1983 .

[4]  Flueckiger Effects of asymmetric magnetospheric currents on cosmic radiation. Environmental research papers , 1982 .

[5]  Norman W. Peddie,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the third generation. , 1982 .

[6]  H. Debrunner,et al.  Detemination of the ring current radii from cosmic ray neutron monitor data for the 17 December 1971 magnetic storm , 1979 .

[7]  M. Arens Partial ring currents and cosmic ray magnetic cutoff rigidity variations , 1978 .

[8]  Shea,et al.  Asymptotic directions and vertical cutoff rigidities for selected cosmic-ray stations as calculated using the International Geomagnetic Reference Field model appropriate for Epoch 1975. 0. Environmental research papers , 1975 .

[9]  M. Shea,et al.  Asymptotic directions and vertical cutoff rigidities for selected cosmic-ray stations as calculated using the Finch and Leaton geomagnetic field model. Environmental research papers , 1975 .

[10]  A. Summers,et al.  Asymptotic cones of acceptance of cosmic ray neutron monitors in a geomagnetic field distorted by the solar wind , 1965 .

[11]  W. Webber Some Features of the Response of Neutron Monitors to Low-Energy Particles Incident on the Top of the Atmosphere , 1962 .

[12]  K. Mccracken The cosmic‐ray flare effect: 1. Some new methods of analysis , 1962 .

[13]  E. Ray Effects of a Ring Current on Cosmic Radiation , 1956 .

[14]  S. Treiman Effect of Equatorial Ring Current on Cosmic-Ray Intensity , 1953 .

[15]  G. Lemaitre,et al.  On the Allowed Cone of Cosmic Radiation , 1936 .