This report describes the adjoint state based sensitivity process for MODFLOW-2005 that calculates the sensitivity of observations to parameters. The process is composed of three basic components, described here for one observation and one parameter; first is the solution of the ground-water flow problem, next this solution is used to calculate the adjoint state for the observation, and finally the sensitivity of the of the observation to the parameter is determined by summing the product of the adjoint state with the derivative of the ground-water flow equations with respect to the parameter for each time step of the flow simulation. The theoretical development presents the mathematical basis for the second two steps in the process. Sensitivity information is useful as part of a parameter estimation process, for reliability analysis, in uncertainty analysis, and to describe error propagation. The program described herein only determines the sensitivities. To implement any of the above analyses the program must be used in conjunction with other software. Sensitivity information can be determined using other approaches such as the direct sensitivity calculations of MODFLOW-2000 (Hill and Others, 2000) and the parameter perturbation method implemented in UCODE_2005 (Poeter and others, 2005) and PEST (Doherty, 2004). This report describes when the adjoint sensitivity process can be expected to be more efficient than these other methods. As a general rule, but not always, adjoint sensitivities require the equivalent computational effort of a head solution simulation for each observation. The other approaches require the computational effort of a head solution for each parameter. If a full matrix of sensitivities is needed, the adjoint state based sensitivities is expected to be more efficient that the other approaches if there are more parameters than observations. There are variations of the basic process that can significantly influence the efficiency of the calculations, depending on the use of the sensitivities and on the structure of the flow simulation. The highest efficiency is reached if the gradient of a weighted sum-of-square error is needed. Only a single adjoint state calculation is performed in this case. The gradient is used by truncated Newton, variable-metric, conjugate gradient, and quasi-Newton optimization procedures. The MODFLOWP (Hill, 1992) implemented parameter estimation using adjoint state based gradients with a conjugate gradient routine for an earlier version of MODFLOW (Harbaugh and McDonald, 1988). A different form of computational efficiency can be gained If the flow simulation has constant time steps. Significant increases in efficiency in determining the
[1]
Mary C. Hill,et al.
MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model : user guide to the LMT6 package, the linkage with MT3DMS for multi-species mass transport modeling
,
2001
.
[2]
Dean S. Oliver,et al.
Automatic History Matching in a Bayesian Framework, Example Applications
,
2005
.
[3]
M. Marietta,et al.
Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 1. Theory and Computational Experiments
,
1995
.
[4]
A. W. Harbaugh.
MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process
,
2005
.
[5]
D. Cacuci,et al.
Applications to large-scale systems
,
2005
.
[6]
Ionel Michael Navon,et al.
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis, Volume II: Applications to Large-Scale Systems
,
2005
.
[7]
Mary C. Hill,et al.
UCODE_2005 and six other computer codes for universal sensitivity analysis, calibration, and uncertainty evaluation constructed using the JUPITER API
,
2006
.
[8]
R. W. Andrews,et al.
Sensitivity Analysis for Steady State Groundwater Flow Using Adjoint Operators
,
1985
.
[9]
J. Sykes,et al.
Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the recharge boundary condition
,
2006
.
[10]
Jesús Carrera,et al.
An Improved form of Adjoint-State Equations for Transient Problems
,
1994
.
[11]
Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.
MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model; user guide to the observation, sensitivity, and parameter-estimation processes and three post-processing programs
,
2000
.
[12]
Paul P. Wang,et al.
MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User's Guide
,
1999
.
[13]
Arthur E. Bryson,et al.
Applied Optimal Control
,
1969
.
[14]
Jesús Carrera,et al.
Subsurface Flow and Transport: Formulations and computational issues of the inversion of random fields
,
1997
.
[15]
Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.
A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model
,
1984
.
[16]
M. Hill.
A computer program (MODFLOWP) for estimating parameters of a transient, three-dimensional ground-water flow model using nonlinear regression
,
1992
.
[17]
Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.
A generalized finite-difference formulation for the U.S. Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model
,
1992
.