A Visual Approach towards Knowledge Engineering and Understanding How Students Learn in Complex Environments

Exploratory learning environments, such as virtual labs, support divergent learning pathways. However, due to their complexity, building computational models of learning is challenging as it is difficult to identify features that (i) are informative with respect to common learning strategies, (ii) abstract similar actions beyond surface differences, and (iii) differentiate groups of learners. In this paper, we present a visualization tool that addresses these challenges by facilitating a novel analytic approach to aid in the knowledge engineering process, focusing on five main capabilities: data-driven hypotheses raising, visualizing behavior over time, easily grouping related actions, contrasting learners' behaviors on these actions, and comparing the behaviors of groups of learners. We apply this analytic approach to better understand how students work with a popular interactive physics virtual lab. By splitting learners by learning gains, we found that productive learners performed more active testing and adapted more quickly to the task at hand by focusing on more relevant testing instruments. Implications for online virtual labs and a broader class of complex learning environments are discussed throughout.

[1]  Mira Dontcheva,et al.  MatrixWave: Visual Comparison of Event Sequence Data , 2015, CHI.

[2]  Yang Wang,et al.  Patterns and Sequences: Interactive Exploration of Clickstreams to Understand Common Visitor Paths , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Help Helps, But Only So Much: Research on Help Seeking with Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[4]  Enrico Bertini,et al.  INFUSE: Interactive Feature Selection for Predictive Modeling of High Dimensional Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Comparing Representations for Learner Models in Interactive Simulations , 2015, AIED.

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[7]  Diansheng Guo,et al.  Coordinating Computational and Visual Approaches for Interactive Feature Selection and Multivariate Clustering , 2003, Inf. Vis..

[8]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Using Hidden Markov Models to Characterize Student Behaviors in Learning-by-Teaching Environments , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[9]  Jody Clarke,et al.  Predicting Successful Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Performance Assessment for Science , 2013, UMAP.

[10]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  On the Benefits of Seeking (and Avoiding) Help in Online Problem-Solving Environments , 2014, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[11]  Thomas A. Powell,et al.  JavaScript: The Complete Reference , 2004 .

[12]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  FeatureInsight: Visual support for error-driven feature ideation in text classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[13]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Session Viewer: Visual Exploratory Analysis of Web Session Logs , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[14]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Leveraging machine-learned detectors of systematic inquiry behavior to estimate and predict transfer of inquiry skill , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[15]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Modeling Students' Metacognitive Errors in Two Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2005, User Modeling.

[16]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Interactive hierarchical dimension ordering, spacing and filtering for exploration of high dimensional datasets , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[17]  Bodong Chen,et al.  Putting temporal analytics into practice: the 5th international workshop on temporality in learning data , 2016, LAK.

[18]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  High-Volume Hypothesis Testing , 2016, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..

[19]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Temporal Event Sequence Simplification , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.