Sustainability as a value-adding concept in the early design phases? Insights from stimulated ideation sessions

As creativity is increasingly important in order to achieve differentiation and competitiveness in industry, designers face the challenge of conceiving and rating large numbers of new product development options. The authors’ recent studies show the effectiveness of ideation procedures guided by stimuli that are submitted to designers in the form of abstract benefits. A rich collection of said benefits has been created to this scope; more specifically, the authors have performed a detailed clustering of the categories described in TRIZ ideality, i.e. useful functions, attenuation of undesired effects and reduction of consumed resources. Aspects related to sustainability and environmental friendliness manifestly appear in the list of stimuli and these issues are reflected in several ideas emerged in initial experiments. However, many promising product development objectives conflict with sustainability or, at least, their adherence to eco-design is arguable. The paper assesses the share of ideas that are supposed to comply with sustainability in experiments described in recent literature. Subsequently, it intends to stimulate a discussion about the introduction of measures to attract attention of designers on sustainability in the critical early product development stages also when green aspects do not represent the fundamental driver to achieve greater customer value. As well, it discusses which sustainability aspects are worth being considered adequately during the very early design phases and which ones could result as exceedingly constraining.

[1]  Joseph R. Fiksel Design for environment : a guide to sustainable product development , 2009 .

[2]  Jérémy Legardeur,et al.  A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools , 2014 .

[3]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies , 2013 .

[4]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Product Planning techniques: investigating the differences between research trajectories and industry expectations , 2016 .

[5]  Frank Figge,et al.  Is Green and Profitable Sustainable? Assessing the Trade-Off between Economic and Environmental Aspects , 2013 .

[6]  Timothy M. Kowalewski,et al.  Large-Scale Needfinding: Methods of Increasing User-Generated Needs From Large Populations , 2015 .

[7]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Adding quality of life to design for Eco-Efficiency , 2016 .

[8]  Ab Stevels Application of EcoDesign: ten years of dynamic development , 2001, Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[9]  Federico Rotini,et al.  A CAD tool to support idea generation in the product planning phase , 2015 .

[10]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  Design for Environmental Sustainability , 2008 .

[11]  Rebeka Lukman,et al.  Review of sustainability terms and their definitions , 2007 .

[12]  Federico Rotini,et al.  An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[13]  Marie-France Vernier,et al.  Economic benefits tied to ecodesign , 2011 .

[14]  María D. Bovea,et al.  A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process , 2012 .

[15]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[16]  Caterina Rizzi,et al.  Is TRIZ an Ecodesign Method , 2016 .

[17]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries , 2016 .

[18]  Tim C. McAloone,et al.  Fuzzy decision support for tools selection in the core front end activities of new product development , 2013 .

[19]  Yuri Borgianni,et al.  Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications , 2016, Comput. Ind..