Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance

Framing is the process by which a communication source, such as a news organization, defines and constructs a political issue or public controversy. Two experiments examined the effect of news frames on tolerance for the Ku Klux Klan. The first presented research participants with one of two local news stories about a Klan rally that varied by frame: One framed the rally as a free speech issue, and the other framed it as a disruption of public order. Participants who viewed the free speech story expressed more tolerance for the Klan than participants who watched the public order story. Additional data indicate that frames affect tolerance by altering the perceived importance of public order values. The relative accessibility of free speech and public order concepts did not respond to framing. A second experiment used a simulated electronic news service to present different frames and replicated these findings.

[1]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[2]  Doris A. Graber,et al.  Media Power in Politics , 1990 .

[3]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences , 1994 .

[4]  Robert E. Lane,et al.  Political Personality and Electoral Choice , 1955, American Political Science Review.

[5]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[6]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[7]  S. Feldman,et al.  A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences , 1992 .

[8]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values , 1995 .

[10]  Larry M. Bartels Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Experimental foundations of political science , 1993 .

[12]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[13]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[14]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Has Racism Declined in America? , 1981 .

[15]  D. Graber,et al.  Mass media and American politics , 1980 .

[16]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .

[17]  Margaret Halsey With malice toward some , 1938 .

[18]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[19]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[20]  S. Stouffer,et al.  Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. , 1956 .

[21]  W. Bennett News, the politics of illusion , 1983 .

[22]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[23]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning , 1986 .

[24]  Eric R. A. N. Smith The Unchanging American Voter , 1989 .

[25]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[26]  S. Iyengar Is Anyone Responsible , 1991 .

[27]  M. Lodge,et al.  The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[28]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[29]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[31]  Alan J. Mayne,et al.  Decision Research: A Field Guide , 1990 .

[32]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Comparisons of Party Identification and Policy Preferences: The Impact of Survey Question Format , 1993 .

[33]  J. Gibson,et al.  Civil Liberties and Nazis: The Skokie Free-Speech Controversy , 1985 .

[34]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences , 1992 .

[35]  R. Wyer,et al.  The Cognitive and Affective Bases of Political Tolerance Judgments , 1991 .

[36]  Stanley Kelley,et al.  The Simple Act of Voting , 1974 .

[37]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Functional measurement approach to self‐estimation in multiattribute evaluation , 1988 .

[38]  S. Feldman,et al.  The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State , 1992 .

[39]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Dimensional salience: judgment and attitudes , 1984 .

[40]  J. E. Jones Divided by Color , 1998 .

[41]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy , 1980 .

[42]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. , 1988 .

[43]  H. Kelley The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[44]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[45]  S. Iyengar,et al.  News That Matters: Television and American Opinion , 1987 .

[46]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[47]  D. Kinder,et al.  Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks , 1990 .

[48]  S. Iyengar Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[49]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming , 1990 .

[50]  Marijke Breuning,et al.  Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation , 1994 .

[51]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[52]  D. Kinder,et al.  Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals , 1996 .

[53]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects , 1997 .

[54]  P. Kaniss Making local news , 1994 .

[55]  H. Asher Causal modeling , 1976 .

[56]  T. E. Patterson Out Of Order , 1993 .

[57]  John Jonides,et al.  Availability heuristic in judgments of set size and frequency of occurrence. , 1993 .

[58]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Contestable categories and public opinion , 1993 .

[59]  Robert Y. Shapiro,et al.  Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's 1960 Presidential Campaign , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[60]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action , 1987 .

[61]  Dennis Chong How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties , 1993 .

[62]  John L. Sullivan,et al.  Political Tolerance and American Democracy , 1982 .