Using Tittle's control balance theory to understand computer crime and deviance

This article studies Tittle's control balance theory that bases criminal and deviant behaviour on the desire to increase levels of autonomy and uses this to deconstruct Internet crime. It suggests that anonymity and deindividuation are facets of opportunity and means of reducing the likelihood that normal constraints will interfere and questions their position as causative elements of computer mediated crime. It suggests that the control balance theory can help to understand why there may be high levels of computer crime and why individuals who might refrain from deviance in the real world may participate in deviant behaviour on-line. Finally, there are tentative suggestions for policy initiatives as well as a recognition that both these and the application of control balance in this area would benefit from further analysis.

[1]  D. Rowland Griping, bitching and speaking your mind: defamation and free expression on the internet , 2006 .

[2]  Roberto J. Mejias,et al.  The Effects of National Culture and Anonymity on Flaming and Criticalness in GSS-Supported Discussions , 2004 .

[3]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Refining control balance theory , 2004 .

[4]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The Impact of Anonymity and Group Identification on Progroup Behavior in Computer-Mediated Groups , 2002 .

[5]  K. Douglas,et al.  Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[6]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[7]  C. R. Tittle,et al.  Continuing the Discussion of Control Balance , 1999 .

[8]  J. Savelsberg Human Nature and Social Control in Complex Society: , 1999 .

[9]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming , 1998 .

[10]  F. Auburn Usenet News and the Law , 1995 .

[11]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[12]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[13]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. , 1990 .

[14]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[15]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.