Using Tittle's control balance theory to understand computer crime and deviance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Rowland. Griping, bitching and speaking your mind: defamation and free expression on the internet , 2006 .
[2] Roberto J. Mejias,et al. The Effects of National Culture and Anonymity on Flaming and Criticalness in GSS-Supported Discussions , 2004 .
[3] Charles R. Tittle,et al. Refining control balance theory , 2004 .
[4] Naomi Ellemers,et al. The Impact of Anonymity and Group Identification on Progroup Behavior in Computer-Mediated Groups , 2002 .
[5] K. Douglas,et al. Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.
[6] T. Postmes,et al. The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .
[7] C. R. Tittle,et al. Continuing the Discussion of Control Balance , 1999 .
[8] J. Savelsberg. Human Nature and Social Control in Complex Society: , 1999 .
[9] R. Gallupe,et al. Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming , 1998 .
[10] F. Auburn. Usenet News and the Law , 1995 .
[11] T. Postmes,et al. A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .
[12] J. Valacich,et al. Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .
[13] Harold G. Grasmick,et al. Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. , 1990 .
[14] M. Hogg,et al. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .
[15] L. Festinger,et al. Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.