How process philosophy can contribute to strategic management

Process philosophy can contribute with alternative perspectives and views to traditional strategic management theory. The Western tradition of thinking, the metaphysics of Being as presence, based upon the binary separation between transcendental ideas and appearances in the real world, has been challenged by process philosophy, from Hellenic and classical philosophy through contemporary philosophy and modern physics. Process philosophy is increasingly relevant for strategic management as everyday strategic management practice has to deal with fluid, changing and complex realities. The aim of this paper is to discuss the notion of process philosophy as being a unifying label for theoretical models that emphasize change over stability, novelty over uniformity, and becoming over being. The contribution of process philosophy to strategic management theory is not primarily ‘theoretical’ but conceptual, and aims at providing alternative perspectives on the concept of strategy. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  Strategic Management and the Straightjacket: An Editorial Essay , 1991 .

[2]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[3]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[4]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[5]  Johann Packendorff,et al.  INQUIRING INTO THE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[6]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[7]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[8]  R. Stacey.  The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes , 1995 .

[9]  Robert Chia,et al.  The Problem of Reflexivity in Organizational Research: Towards a Postmodern Science of Organization , 1996 .

[10]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[11]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  More Fragmentation? Unfinished Business in Linking the Social Sciences and the Humanities. , 1996 .

[12]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[13]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[14]  C. Grey,et al.  How to Become Oneself: Discourses of Subjectivity in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 1997 .

[15]  Roland Calori,et al.  Essai: Philosophizing on Strategic Management Models , 1998 .

[16]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[17]  Andrew Mair.  Learning from Honda , 1999 .

[18]  N. Foss.  Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage , 1999 .

[19]  M. Sarvary.  Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry , 1999 .

[20]  James G. Combs,et al.  Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics , 1999 .

[21]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[22]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .

[23]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[24]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  Determinants and Development of Schools in Organization Theory , 1999 .

[25]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .