Comparison of Dot-ELISA and Sandwich ELISA Diagnostic Tests in Detection of Human Hydatidosis

Hydatidosis, caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus, is one of the most important zoonosis with worldwide distribution. As its diagnosis by clinical symptoms and scanning alone is difficult and confusing, we designed the present study to achieve a sensitive and simple diagnostic method for epidemiological studies. Sera (250 samples) were collected from 90 cases of hydatidosis proven by surgical operation, 80 patients with diseases other than hydatidosis and 80 healthy cases. The antigen (Ag) used was a crude hydatid fluid Ag obtained from lung and liver cycts of sheep slaughtered in Tehran abattoir (Iran). The result of dot-ELISA showed 100% sensitivity and 98.75% specificity . Positive and negative predictive values were 97.82% and 100% respectively. In the case of sandwich ELISA, the results were as follows: 92.22% sensitivity, 98.75% specificity, positive and negative predictive values: 97.64% and 95.75 %, respectively. In both techniques, cross reaction with fasciolosis was observed for two cases. In conclusion, although these two tests had very similar results, dot-ELISA was more acceptable with respect to its higher sensitivity and simplicity in practice. Iran. Biomed. J. 9 (2): 91-94, 2005

[1]  S. Abdel-Hafez,et al.  Serodiagnosis and seroepidemiology of human unilocular hydatidosis in Jordan , 2004, Parasitology Research.

[2]  P. Craig,et al.  Echinococcosis: disease, detection and transmission , 2003, Parasitology.

[3]  H. Bradshaw,et al.  Rapid dot-ELISA for the detection of specific antigens in the cyst fluid from human cases of cystic echinococcosis , 2002, Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology.

[4]  R. Riganò,et al.  Native and recombinant antigens in the immunodiagnosis of human cystic echinococcosis , 2000, Parasite immunology.

[5]  M. Bratos,et al.  Evaluation of six serological tests in diagnosis and postoperative control of pulmonary hydatid disease patients. , 1999, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[6]  M. Taylor Analytical parasitology. , 1998, Parasitology today.

[7]  N. Ramadan,et al.  Studies on the most reactive purified antigen for immuno-diagnosis of hydatid disease. , 1996, Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology.

[8]  H. Wen,et al.  Immunoglobulin G subclass responses in human cystic and alveolar echinococcosis. , 1994, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[9]  R. Grillot,et al.  Diagnosis of human hydatidosis: comparison between imagery and six serologic techniques. , 1994, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[10]  M. Jones,et al.  Human hydatid disease: evaluation of an ELISA for diagnosis, population screening and monitoring of control programmes. , 1993, Journal of medical microbiology.

[11]  S. Sallam,et al.  Dot-ELISA as a diagnostic test in hydatid disease. , 1992, Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology.

[12]  P. Craig,et al.  Evaluation of a rapid dot-ELISA as a field test for the diagnosis of cystic hydatid disease. , 1991, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[13]  A. Grilli,et al.  The serological diagnosis of human hydatid disease by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay. , 1991, Journal of Infection.

[14]  B. Gottstein An immunoassay for the detection of circulating antigens in human echinococcosis. , 1984, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[15]  G. Nelson,et al.  The detection of circulating antigen in human hydatid disease. , 1984, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.