Magnetic Stimulation of the Right Visual Cortex Impairs Form-specific Priming

Recent evidence suggests that priming of objects across different images (abstract priming) and priming of specific images of an object (form-specific priming) are mediated by dissociable neural processing subsystems that operate in parallel and are predominantly linked to left and right hemispheric processing, respectively [Marsolek, C. J. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychological Science, 10, 111118, 1999]. Previous brain imaging studies have provided important information about the neuroanatomical regions that are involved in form-specific and abstract priming; however, these techniques did not fully establish the functional significance of priming-related changes in cortical brain activity. Here, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in order to establish the functional role of the right occipital cortex in form-specific priming [Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., Kishiyama, M. M., Baynes, K., Knight, R. T., & Gazzaniga, M. S. The neural substrates of visual implicit memory: Do the two hemispheres play different roles? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 833842, 2003]. Compared to no TMS and sham TMS, rTMS of the right occipital cortex disrupted immediate form-specific priming in a semantic categorization task. Left occipital rTMS, on the other hand, had no converse effect on abstractive priming. Abstract priming may involve deeper semantic processing and may be unresponsive to magnetic stimulation of a single cortical locus. Our TMS results show that form-specific priming relies on a visual word-form system localized in the right occipital lobe, in line with the predictions from divided visual field behavioral studies [Marsolek, 1999].

[1]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Walsh,et al.  Motion perception and perceptual learning: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1999 .

[5]  H. Heinze,et al.  Perceptual Priming Versus Explicit Memory: Dissociable Neural Correlates at Encoding , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  T. Karlsson,et al.  Visual Implicit Memory Deficit and Developmental Surface Dyslexia: A Case of Early Occipital Damage , 2000, Cortex.

[7]  C. J. Marsolek.  Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  J. R. Hughes,et al.  Sensory integration in children. Evoked potentials and intersensory functions in pediatrics and psychology: T. Shipley (Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1980, 154 p., U.S. $ 15.50) , 1981 .

[11]  A. Cowey,et al.  Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers , 2000, Neuroreport.

[12]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Positron Emission Tomography: A New Method for Studying Connectivity of the Human Cerebral Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Christina M. Frederick,et al.  Visual Implicit Memory in the Left Hemisphere: Evidence From Patients With Callosotomies and Right Occipital Lobe Lesions , 2001, Psychological science.

[15]  Paul A. Skarratt,et al.  Magnetic Stimulation of the Left Visual Cortex Impairs Expert Word Recognition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M Hallett,et al.  Mood improvement following daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression: a placebo-controlled crossover trial. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Chad J. Marsolek,et al.  Abstractionist versus Exemplar-Based Theories of Visual Word Priming: A Subsystems Resolution , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Karine Lebreton,et al.  Visual Priming Within and Across Symbolic Format Using a Tachistoscopic Picture Identification Task: A PET Study , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Zafiris J Daskalakis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new investigational and treatment tool in psychiatry. , 2002, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[22]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  A Magnetic Stimulation Examination of Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: delays in visual suppression due to luminance changes. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[24]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Visual Implicit Memory: Do the Two Hemispheres Play Different Roles? , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A P Rudell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in study of the visual pathway. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[26]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[27]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  C. J. Marsolek.  Dissociable Neural Subsystems Underlie Abstract and Specific Object Recognition , 1999 .

[29]  R. Henson,et al.  Priming, response learning and repetition suppression , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Burton,et al.  Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  M. Koivisto.  Form-Specific Priming and Functional Brain Asymmetries in Perceptual Identification , 1996, Cortex.

[34]  J. Bowers,et al.  Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: was Morton right all along? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  J. Bowers,et al.  Masked priming is abstract in the left and right visual fields , 2005, Brain and Language.

[36]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Manifestation of scotomas created by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human visual cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Alan P. Rudell,et al.  Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry , 1993, Brain Research.

[38]  V. Walsh,et al.  The cortical representation of centrally presented words: A magnetic stimulation study , 2003 .

[39]  E. Darcy Burgund,et al.  Letter-Case-Specific Priming in the Right Cerebral Hemisphere with a Form-Specific Perceptual Identification Task , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  Simon C Gandevia,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some “sham” forms active? , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[41]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  M Hallett,et al.  Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Christina M. Frederick,et al.  Form-Specific Visual Priming in the Left and Right Hemispheres , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[47]  J. Bowers,et al.  Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  D L Schacter,et al.  Visual word stem completion priming within and across modalities: a PET study. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[49]  A. Cowey,et al.  The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in studies of vision, attention and cognition. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[50]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Are recognition deficits following occipital lobe TMS explained by raised detection thresholds? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Font-specific priming following global amnesia and occipital lobe damage. , 1998, Neuropsychology.