Fostering student sense making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers' use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction

While research has shown that elementary (K-5) students are capable of engaging in the scientific practice of explanation construction, commonly-used elementary science curriculum materials may not always afford them opportunities to do so. As a result, elementary teachers must often adapt their science curriculum materials to better support students' explanation construction and foster student sense making. However, little research has been conducted to explore if and, if so, how and why, elementary teachers modify science curriculum materials to engage students in explanation construction. We use an embedded mixed methods research design to explore elementary teachers' (n = 45) curricular adaptations and pedagogical reasoning. We collected and quantitatively analyzed a matched set of 121 elementary science lesson plans and video recorded lesson enactments to investigate the extent to which inservice elementary teachers engage in instruction to more productively support students' explanation construction. Our findings suggest that the curriculum materials heavily emphasized hands-on engagement and data collection over explanation construction and that the teachers' adaptations did not fundamentally alter scientific sense-making opportunities afforded students in the lesson plans. Interviews and other artifacts were also collected and analyzed to construct a multiple-case study of four of these elementary teachers. Findings from the case study suggest that the teachers' conceptions of explanation construction and concerns about the abilities of their students to engage in scientific explanations impacted their curricular adaptations. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 50: 989–1017, 2013

[1]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Elementary Teachers' Curriculum Design and Pedagogical Reasoning for Supporting Students' Comparison and Evaluation of Evidence-Based Explanations , 2013, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Investigating Essential Characteristics of Scientific Practices in Elementary Science Learning Environments: The Practices of Science Observation Protocol (P‐SOP) , 2013 .

[3]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Preservice Elementary Teachers and Explanation Construction: Knowledge‐for‐Practice and Knowledge‐in‐Practice , 2013 .

[4]  Laura Zangori,et al.  This Is Inquiry ... Right , 2012 .

[5]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson† , 2012 .

[6]  N. Songer,et al.  Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions. , 2012 .

[7]  Katherine L. McNeill Elementary Students' Views of Explanation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments over the School Year. , 2011 .

[8]  M. Windschitl,et al.  Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education , 2011 .

[9]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? , 2011 .

[10]  Kathleen E. Metz Disentangling Robust Developmental Constraints From the Instructionally Mutable: Young Children's Epistemic Reasoning About a Study of Their Own Design , 2011 .

[11]  Cory T. Forbes,et al.  Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials , 2010 .

[12]  E. Wiebe,et al.  The Cross-Case Analyses of Elementary Students’ Engagement in the Strands of Science Proficiency , 2010 .

[13]  Min Li,et al.  Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students' scientific explanations and student learning , 2010 .

[14]  Andy Cavagnetto,et al.  The Nature of Elementary Student Science Discourse in the Context of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach , 2010 .

[15]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Investigating Teacher Learning Supports in High School Biology Curricular Programs to Inform the Design of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2009 .

[16]  Kathleen E. Metz Elementary school teachers as ``targets and agents of change'': Teachers' learning in interaction with reform science curriculum , 2009 .

[17]  H. Patrick,et al.  Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten , 2008 .

[18]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .

[19]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Fostering Second Graders' Scientific Explanations: A Beginning Elementary Teacher's Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practice , 2008 .

[20]  R. Duschl Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[21]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[22]  E. Stern,et al.  Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students' understanding of "floating and sinking." , 2006 .

[23]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  SAS for Mixed Models, Second Edition , 2006 .

[24]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher's specialized practices and knowledge , 2005 .

[25]  J. Remillard Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[26]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[27]  Shirley J. Magnusson,et al.  Teacher, Text, and Experience: A Case of Young Children's Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[28]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[29]  J. D. Trout Scientific Explanation And The Sense Of Understanding* , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[30]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[31]  Kenneth L. King,et al.  Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices , 2001 .

[32]  Kathleen E. Metz Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[33]  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2015 .

[34]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[35]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .

[36]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[37]  W. Salmon Causality and Explanation , 1998 .

[38]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[39]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .