The effects of visual magnification and physical movement scale on the manipulation of a tool with indirect vision.

Modern tools often separate the visual and physical aspects of operation, requiring users to manipulate an instrument while viewing the results indirectly on a display. This can pose usability challenges particularly in applications, such as laparoscopic surgery, that require a high degree of movement precision. Magnification used to augment the view and, theoretically, enable finer movements, may introduce other visual-motor disruptions due to the apparent speed of the visual motion on screen (i.e., motion scaling). In this research, we sought to better understand the effects of visual magnification on human movement performance and control in operating a tool via indirect vision. Ten adult participants manipulated a computer mouse to direct a pointer to targets on a display. Results (Experiment 1) showed that, despite increased motion scaling, magnification of the view on screen enabled higher precision control of the mouse pointer. However, the relative effectiveness of visual magnification ultimately depended on the scale of the physical movement, and more specifically the precision limits of the whole-hand grip afforded by the mouse. When the physical scale of the hand/mouse movement was reduced (Experiment 2), fine-precision control began to reach its limits, even at full magnification. The role of magnification can thus be understood as "amplifying" the particular skill level afforded by the effecting limb. These findings suggest a fruitful area for future research is the optimization of hand-control interfaces of tools to maximize movement precision.

[1]  Michael Bohan,et al.  KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF MOUSE CURSOR POSITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF MOVEMENT SCALE AND JOINT SET , 2003 .

[2]  Eric A Roy,et al.  Effect of movement termination in single- and dual-phase pointing tasks. , 2004, Motor control.

[3]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Human-machine interfaces for minimally invasive surgery , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[4]  Robert R A van Doorn,et al.  Influence of different modes of real time visual information on single aimed movements. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Michael Bohan,et al.  Kinematic analysis of multiple constraints on a pointing task. , 2007, Human movement science.

[6]  J. Summers Approaches to the study of motor control and learning , 1992 .

[7]  John McTaggart Ellis McTaggart,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE METHOD , 2011 .

[8]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Computational Motor Control and Human Factors: Modeling Movements in Real and Possible Environments , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .

[10]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[11]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Rescaling an acquired discrete aiming movement: Specific or general motor learning? , 1997 .

[13]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Development of a method for measuring movement-related effort , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  F Tendick,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot-tying task. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[15]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  "Beating" Fitts' law: virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  M Patkin,et al.  Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection. , 1995, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[17]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Hau-San Wong,et al.  Human Computer Interaction , 2006, Encyclopedia of Multimedia.

[19]  J. J. Bloomberg,et al.  Context-dependent arm pointing adaptation , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Scale effects in steering law tasks , 2001, CHI.

[21]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Navigation as multiscale pointing: extending Fitts' model to very high precision tasks , 1999, CHI '99.

[22]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[23]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control , 1997, CHI.

[24]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Darin Ellis,et al.  Optimizing the Surgeon-Robot Interface: The Effect of Control-Display Gain and Zoom Level on Movement Time , 2004 .

[26]  Loukia D. Loukopoulos,et al.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. , 1995, Psychological review.

[27]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  D. Glencross,et al.  Chapter 10 The Processing of Visual Feedback in Rapid Movements: Revisited , 1992 .

[29]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  N Walker,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Rapid Cursor-Positioning Movements with Electromechanical Mice in Human-Computer Interaction , 1993, Human factors.

[32]  David A Rosenbaum,et al.  A Method for Obtaining Psychophysical Estimates of Movement Costs , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[33]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Target acquisition in multiscale electronic worlds , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Frank Marchak,et al.  Constraints for Action Selection: Overhand Versus Underhand Grips , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[35]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Y. Coello,et al.  Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: adaptation to scale change , 2000, Ergonomics.

[38]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[39]  Rafael Ballagas,et al.  The impact of gain change on perceiving one's own actions , 2008, MuC.

[40]  Robert R A van Doorn,et al.  The locus of adaptation to altered gain in aimed movements. , 2005, Human movement science.

[41]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[42]  Gary D. Langolf,et al.  Human Performance Times in Microscope Work , 1975 .

[43]  Deric Wisleder,et al.  Influence of biomechanical factors on substructure of pointing movements , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Robert R A van Doorn,et al.  Effects of adaptation to altered display gain on the control of single aimed movements. , 2005, Motor control.

[46]  D. Chaffin,et al.  An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[47]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  Watching a cursor distorts haptically guided reproduction of mouse movement. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.