Analysis of GRACE uncertainties by hydrological and hydro-meteorological observations

Abstract The uncertainty in grace gravimetric data emanates from a superposition of errors from different sources, whose separation is difficult. In situ hydrological and hydro-meteorological observations, under certain conditions, facilitate the identification of different uncertainty types, and the quantification of their contribution to the overall error budget. In this paper, monthly grace solutions, hydrological and hydro-meteorological data, and their respective combinations are assessed to ascertain their uncertainties. Unphysical outliers in grace data are identified, removed, and replaced, which leads to a significant increase (up to 70%) in correlation with hydrological and hydro-meteorological data, and also a sizeable reduction (up to 40%) in noise level. On further statistical analysis, physical signals that neither have hydrological nor hydro-meteorological character are identified in the grace data at the residual level. These signals have a long-range correlation, which is untypical of hydrological/hydro-meteorological signals, and also have a strong latitudinal dependence. In keeping with their character of long-range correlations, these signals are collectively termed as correlated error and removed. This further increases the correlation of grace data with hydrological and hydro-meteorological data by up to 30%, and also reduces the noise level by up to 50%. Due to its latitudinal dependence, the reduction of correlated error is of specific importance to applications of grace in the boreal and equatorial regions with low signal amplitudes.

[1]  James S. Famiglietti,et al.  GRACE-Based Estimates of Terrestrial Freshwater Discharge from Basin to Continental Scales , 2007 .

[2]  A. Güntner,et al.  Time Variation In Hydrology and Gravity , 2004 .

[3]  S. Petrovic,et al.  Analysis of gravity field variations derived from Superconducting Gravimeter recordings, the GRACE satellite and hydrological models at selected European sites , 2008 .

[4]  Sonia I. Seneviratne,et al.  Basin‐scale water‐balance estimates of terrestrial water storage variations from ECMWF operational forecast analysis , 2006 .

[5]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Detectability of variations in continental water storage from satellite observations of the time dependent gravity field , 1999 .

[6]  Gravity and the hydrosphere: new frontier , 1999 .

[7]  Guillaume Ramillien,et al.  Comparison of in situ bottom pressure data with GRACE gravimetry in the Crozet‐Kerguelen region , 2006 .

[8]  黄晓燕,et al.  IgG , 2010, Definitions.

[9]  C. Shum,et al.  Continental Water Storage Changes from GRACE Line-of-Sight Range Acceleration Measurements , 2008 .

[10]  C. Hughes,et al.  Observing seasonal bottom pressure variability in the North Pacific with GRACE , 2006 .

[11]  S. Swenson,et al.  Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates , 2006 .

[12]  Olaf Boebel,et al.  Validation of GRACE Gravity Fields by In-Situ Data of Ocean Bottom Pressure , 2010 .

[13]  O. Kolditz,et al.  Large-scale Modeling of the Groundwater Resources on the Arabian Platform , 2011 .

[14]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[15]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Estimating groundwater storage changes in the Mississippi River basin (USA) using GRACE , 2007 .

[16]  J. Ihde,et al.  Gravity field variations from superconducting gravimeters for GRACE validation , 2009 .

[17]  James L. Davis,et al.  Land water storage within the Congo Basin inferred from GRACE satellite gravity data , 2006 .

[18]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Tracking Fresh Water from Space , 2003, Science.

[19]  Michael G. Sideris,et al.  Analysis of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment time‐variable mass redistribution signals over North America by means of principal component analysis , 2007 .

[20]  O. Andersen,et al.  Seasonal changes in the European gravity field from GRACE: A comparison with superconducting gravimeters and hydrology model predictions , 2006 .

[21]  N. Sneeuw,et al.  Outlier identification and correction for GRACE aggregated data , 2011 .

[22]  Guillaume Ramillien,et al.  External geophysics, climate and environment Global land water storage change from GRACE over 2002-2009; Inference on sea level , 2010 .

[23]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[24]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Comparison of seasonal terrestrial water storage variations from GRACE with groundwater‐level measurements from the High Plains Aquifer (USA) , 2007 .

[25]  S. Swenson,et al.  Remote sensing of groundwater storage changes in Illinois using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) , 2006 .

[26]  A. Güntner,et al.  Calibration analysis for water storage variability of the global hydrological model WGHM , 2009 .

[27]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Continental-Scale Basin Water Storage Variation from Global and Dynamically Downscaled Atmospheric Water Budgets in Comparison with GRACE-Derived Observations , 2012 .