Using Declarative Knowledge to Improve Information Search Performance

Knowledge acquisition theory holds that superior judgment/decision‐making performance depends on procedural knowledge, which, in turn, results from experience (practice and feedback). This research demonstrates that, under certain conditions, performance can be improved by exposure to declarative knowledge alone, without costly practice and feedback. Practicing tax accountants and graduate tax students participated in a computer‐interactive study to improve tax research performance. Using a pretest‐posttest design, knowledge and performance were measured prior to, and after, a treatment group (but not a control group) was exposed to a declarative knowledge intervention intended to enhance their knowledge of the content and structure of the Internal Revenue Code. Comparison of the treatment and control groups on posttest knowledge and posttest performance using commercial electronic tax research systems confirmed that the intervention was effective in improving both efficiency and effectiveness in research...

[1]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[2]  A. Collins,et al.  Cognition and learning. , 1996 .

[3]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[4]  Brian C. Spilker,et al.  The effects of time pressure and knowledge on key word selection behavior in tax research , 1995 .

[5]  William Remus,et al.  Does Feedback Improve the Accuracy of Recurrent Judgmental Forecasts , 1996 .

[6]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Rationality and the sanctity of competence , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Robert Libby,et al.  Modeling the determinants of audit expertise , 1994 .

[8]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Eliminating recency with self‐review: the case of auditors' ‘going concern’ judgments , 2002 .

[9]  R. Nisbett.  Rules for reasoning , 1993 .

[10]  Michael S. Schadewald,et al.  The use of analogy in legal argument: problem similarity, precedent, and expertise , 1993 .

[11]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Threshold adjustment in response to asymmetric loss functions: The case of auditors' substantial doubt thresholds , 2002 .

[12]  Lauren Leslie,et al.  Effect of Prior Knowledge on Good and Poor Readers' Memory of Text. , 1988 .

[13]  Paul L. Walker,et al.  The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge , 1994 .

[14]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing: Acknowledgments , 1995 .

[15]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Using Decision Aids to Improve Auditors' Conditional Probability Judgments , 1998 .

[16]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Knowledge structure and the estimation of conditional probabilities in audit planning , 1995 .

[17]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  The effects of error frequency and accounting knowledge on error diagnosis in analytical review , 1993 .

[18]  K. Ericsson,et al.  Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: an introduction , 1991 .

[19]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment , 1995 .

[20]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Audit category knowledge as a precondition to learning from experience , 1997 .

[21]  Barry L. Lewis,et al.  Determinants of Auditor Expertise , 1990 .

[22]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Using and evaluating audit decision aids , 1988 .

[23]  Christine E. Earley.  Knowledge Acquisition in Auditing: Training Novice Auditors to Recognize Cue Relationships in Real Estate Valuation , 2001 .

[24]  Leslie B. Hammer,et al.  Task information, cognitive information, or functional validity information: Which components of cognitive feedback affect performance?☆ , 1992 .

[25]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[26]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[27]  John A. Barrick.  The Effect of Code Section Knowledge on Tax‐Research Performance , 2001 .

[28]  C. Cloyd,et al.  Performance in Tax Research Tasks: The Joint Effects of Knowledge and Accountability , 1998 .

[29]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[30]  R. Hogarth.  Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1982 .

[31]  Steven M. Glover,et al.  The Influence of Decision Aids on User Behavior: Implications for Knowledge Acquisition and Inappropriate Reliance , 1997 .

[32]  Robert Libby,et al.  Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing: The role of knowledge and memory in audit judgment , 1995 .

[33]  Ira Solomon,et al.  Experience, expertise and expert-performance research in public accounting , 1989 .

[34]  Robert Libby,et al.  Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation , 1993 .

[35]  Wiliam F. Messier.  THE EFFECT OF EXPERIENCE AND FIRM TYPE ON MATERIALITY DISCLOSURE JUDGMENTS , 1983 .

[36]  Sarah E. Bonner,et al.  Expertise In Corporate-Tax Planning - The Issue Identification Stage , 1992 .

[37]  W. Waller,et al.  The auditor and learning from experience: Some conjectures , 1984 .

[38]  A. Renkl.  Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations , 1999 .