Behavioral, anatomical, and physiological aspects of recovery of motor function following stroke

Restoration of motor function is relatively common in humans and non-human primates. Studies of the behavioral aspects of recovery indicate that responses re-emerge in a fixed sequence that resembles initial acquisition. The extent to which this occurs depends on factors unique to the subject. Research suggests that the traditional view of a hierarchically organized brain is inaccurate. Instead, the brain is comprised of parallel circuits which may be disinhibited and/or recruited when damage occurs. In some cases, damage leads to reorganization of cerebral cortical maps. Available data point to the utility of interventions to promote recovery. Research suggests that recovery from other forms of impairment (e.g., non-vascular lesions or impairment in language) involves similar processes.

[1]  K. Seki,et al.  Recovery of impaired motor function of the upper extremity after stroke. , 1992, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infraction , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[3]  F Chollet,et al.  The functional anatomy of recovery from brain injury. , 1991, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[4]  T. Twitchell The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. , 1951, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  B. Will,et al.  Effets de l'environnement sur la restauration fonctionnelle après lésions hippocampiques chez des rats adultes , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. , 1987, Progress in brain research.

[7]  W. Fries,et al.  Motor recovery following capsular stroke. Role of descending pathways from multiple motor areas. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  R. Beaglehole,et al.  Recovery of motor function after stroke. , 1988, Stroke.

[9]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[10]  W. Garraway,et al.  The continuing decline in the incidence of stroke. , 1983, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  J. Jones,et al.  Sparing of motor function after cortical injury. A new perspective on underlying mechanisms. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[12]  J. Feigenson,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation: Effectiveness, Benefits, and Cost. Some Practical Considerations , 1979, Stroke.

[13]  T. Twitchell The automatic grasping responses of infants , 1965 .

[14]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Cortical function in progressive lower motor neuron disorders and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1994, Neurology.

[15]  S. Waxman Functional recovery in diseases of the nervous system. , 1988, Advances in neurology.

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  Recovery after stroke , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  Strick Pl,et al.  Anatomical organization of multiple motor areas in the frontal lobe: implications for recovery of function. , 1988 .

[18]  P. Laycock,et al.  The rate of recovery from stroke - and its measurement. , 1981, International rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[20]  R. Ulrich View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[21]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Imaging recovery of function following brain injury , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Similar Motor Recovery of Upper and Lower Extremities After Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[23]  W. Garraway,et al.  Motor function after stroke. , 1985, Age and ageing.

[24]  A. Brodal,et al.  Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  C. Weiller Recovery from Motor Stroke: Human Positron Emission Tomography Studies , 1995 .

[26]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys , 1983, Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Cynader,et al.  Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  P Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Clinical observations on recovery from stroke. , 1988, Advances in neurology.

[29]  W. Garraway,et al.  Changing Pattern of Cerebral Infarction: 1945–1974 , 1979, Stroke.

[30]  R. G. Lee,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying Functional Recovery Following Stroke , 1995, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[31]  Wall Pd Recruitment of ineffective synapses after injury. , 1988 .

[32]  R. Ruff,et al.  Principles of Neurology, 5th Ed. , 1995, Neurology.