E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review

Electronic mail (e-mail) has been used to distribute surveys and collect data from online users for almost fifteen years. However, some have suggested that the use of e-mail is becoming obsolete. This study analyzes response rates to e-mail surveys undertaken since 1986 and examines five influences to response rates: the year the study was undertaken, the number of questions in the survey, the number of pre-notification contacts, the number of follow-up contacts and survey topic salience. Response rates to e-mail surveys have significantly decreased since 1986. Correlation and regression analyses suggest that year that the survey was undertaken and number of follow-up contacts had the most influence on response rates. A discussion of other influences and future research into this area is provided.

[1]  Susan H. Komsky.  A Profile of Users of Electronic Mail in a University , 1991 .

[2]  Ward S. Mason,et al.  LIVING RESEARCHAN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FACTORS AFFECTING RESPONSE TO A MAIL SURVEY OF BEGINNING TEACHERS , 1961 .

[3]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. , 1978 .

[4]  Christine B. Smith,et al.  Casting the Net: Surveying an Internet Population , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Using the Internet for Market Research: A Study of Private Trading on the Internet , 1999 .

[6]  Alan C.B. Tse,et al.  Comparing Two Methods of Sending out Questionnaires: E-mail versus Mail , 1995 .

[7]  Paul Murphy,et al.  Miscellany: Exploring the Effects of Postcard Prenotification on Industrial Firms’ Response to Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[8]  Nigel Bradley,et al.  Sampling for Internet Surveys. An Examination of Respondent Selection for Internet Research , 1999 .

[9]  V. Mitchell,et al.  Effect of industrial prenotification on response rate, speed, quality, bias, and cost , 1994 .

[10]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1991 .

[11]  John Saunders,et al.  A note on the applicability of the Bruvold-Comer model of mail survey response rates to commercial populations , 1993 .

[12]  Charles L. Martin,et al.  The Impact of Topic Interest on Mail Survey Response Behaviour , 1994 .

[13]  Paul R. Murphy,et al.  Improving survey responses with postcards , 1990 .

[14]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Questionnaire design, return rates, and response favorableness in an employee attitude questionnaire. , 1990 .

[15]  Charles W. Lamb,et al.  Effect on Mail Survey Return Rates of Including Questionnaires with Follow-up Letters , 1981 .

[16]  A. Paolo,et al.  Response Rate Comparisons of E-Mail- and Mail-Distributed Student Evaluations , 2000, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[17]  David Jobber,et al.  Improving response rates in industrial mail surveys , 1986 .

[18]  Susan E. Anderson,et al.  Using Electronic Mail Surveys and Computer-Monitored Data for Studying Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1995 .

[19]  Alan Tse,et al.  Comparing Response Rate, Response Speed and Response Quality of Two Methods of Sending Questionnaires: E-mail vs. Mail , 1998 .

[20]  J. Stanton.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF DATA COLLECTION USING THE INTERNET , 1998 .

[21]  Lorraine Parker.  Collecting data the e-mail way , 1992 .

[22]  S. Kiesler,et al.  SELF-SELECTED AND RANDOMLY SELECTED RESPONDENTS IN A COMPUTER NETWORK SURVEY , 1992 .

[23]  R. Weitkunat,et al.  Social Science Computer Review Internet Surveys by Direct Mailing : an Innovative Way of Collecting Data Internet Surveys by Direct Mailing an Innovative Way of Collecting Data , 2022 .

[24]  K. Sheehan.  Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration , 1999 .

[25]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[26]  Klaus Eichner,et al.  Predicting Reponse Rates to Mailed Questionnaires , 1981 .

[27]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 1994 .

[28]  Robert M. Groves,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN A SURVEY , 1992 .

[29]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  Using E-mail To Survey Internet Users In The United States: Methodology And Assessment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  James H. Watt,et al.  Internet systems for evaluation research , 1999 .

[31]  David C. Schmittlein,et al.  The Distribution of Survey Contact and Participation in the United States: Constructing a Survey-Based Estimate , 1999 .

[32]  M. Crask,et al.  MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATE A META-ANALYSIS OF SELECTED TECHNIQUES FOR INDUCING RESPONSE , 1988 .

[33]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[34]  David R. James,et al.  Profit Constraints on Managerial Autonomy: Managerial Theory and the Unmaking of the Corporation President , 1981 .

[35]  Morton L. Brown.  USE OF A POSTCARD QUERY IN MAIL SURVEYS , 1965 .

[36]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  Online Privacy: Internet Advertising Practitioners' Knowledge and Practices , 2001 .

[37]  Raj Mehta,et al.  Comparing Response Rates and Response Content in Mail versus Electronic Mail Surveys , 1995 .

[38]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment , 1998 .

[39]  Gi Woong Yun,et al.  Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Response Effects in the Electronic Survey , 1986 .

[41]  J. Comer,et al.  A model for estimating the response rate to a mailed survey , 1988 .

[42]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[43]  Charles L. Martin,et al.  Riding the Wave: Response Rates and the Effects of Time Intervals between Successive Mail Survey Follow-up Efforts , 2000 .

[44]  Curt J. Dommeyer,et al.  Comparing Two Forms of an E-mail Survey: Embedded vs Attached , 2000 .