Flexible Interim Analyses in Clinical Trials Using Multistage Adaptive Test Designs

Data-dependent interim analyses are a useful tool in confirmatory Phase III or IV clinical research. In particular, redesigning the sample size in an interim analysis based on the results observed to date considerably improves the power of the trial since the best available information at the time is used for the sample size adjustment. In recent years, several methods were proposed that enable a flexible design through the use of adaptive interim analyses while maintaining the type I error rate. In this article, these methods are briefly reviewed. We recommend a strategy that copes well with the demands of practice. Examples illustrate the use of multistage adaptive designs that make it possible to calculate confidence intervals and bias adjusted point estimates.

[1]  J. Wittes,et al.  The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  M A Proschan,et al.  Designed extension of studies based on conditional power. , 1995, Biometrics.

[3]  L E Braitman Statistical estimates and clinical trials. , 1993, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  L Fisher,et al.  Statistical Inference for Self‐Designing Clinical Trials with a One‐Sided Hypothesis , 1999, Biometrics.

[5]  R. Kay Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials , 1998, The Journal of international medical research.

[6]  J. Wittes,et al.  The Use of Interim Analysis for Sample Size Adjustment , 1993 .

[7]  T M Therneau,et al.  Designs for group sequential phase II clinical trials. , 1987, Biometrics.

[8]  T. Fleming,et al.  Parameter estimation following group sequential hypothesis testing , 1990 .

[9]  G Y Chi,et al.  The attractiveness of the concept of a prospectively designed two-stage clinical trial. , 1999, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[10]  A. Tsiatis,et al.  Approximately optimal one-parameter boundaries for group sequential trials. , 1987, Biometrics.

[11]  A. Gould Planning and revising the sample size for a trial. , 1995, Statistics in Medicine.

[12]  H. Schäfer,et al.  Adaptive Group Sequential Designs for Clinical Trials: Combining the Advantages of Adaptive and of Classical Group Sequential Approaches , 2001, Biometrics.

[13]  Gernot Wassmer,et al.  Multistage Adaptive Test Procedures Based on Fisher's Product Criterion , 1999 .

[14]  M Kieser,et al.  Combining different phases in the development of medical treatments within a single trial. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Interim analyses: the repeated confidence interval approach , 1989 .

[16]  Alan Phillips,et al.  The International Conference on Harmonization Guideline “Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials”: Issues in Applying the Guideline in Practice , 2000 .

[17]  B. Turnbull,et al.  Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 1999 .

[18]  L. Braitman,et al.  Satistical estimates and clinical trials , 1993 .

[19]  W. Lehmacher,et al.  Sequential and Multiple Testing for Dose-Response Analysis , 2000 .

[20]  Z. Shun,et al.  Type I error in sample size re‐estimations based on observed treatment difference , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  J Röhmel,et al.  An adaptive method for establishing a dose-response relationship. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Estimating and reducing bias in group sequential designs with Gaussian independent increment structure , 1997 .

[23]  G. Chi,et al.  On Sample Size and Inference for Two‐Stage Adaptive Designs , 2001, Biometrics.

[24]  K Kim,et al.  Point estimation following group sequential tests. , 1989, Biometrics.

[25]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[26]  M A Proschan,et al.  An improved double sampling procedure based on the variance. , 2000, Biometrics.

[27]  B. K. Ghosh,et al.  Handbook of sequential analysis , 1991 .

[28]  S J Pocock,et al.  Interim analyses for randomized clinical trials: the group sequential approach. , 1982, Biometrics.

[29]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Exact calculations for sequential t, X2 and F tests , 1991 .

[30]  C. Jennison,et al.  Group Sequential tests and Repeated Confidence Intervals , 1988 .

[31]  S S Emerson Computation of the uniform minimum variance unbiased estimator of a normal mean following a group sequential trial. , 1993, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[32]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Group sequential methods for clinical trials with a one-sided hypothesis , 1980 .

[33]  S. Day,et al.  Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[34]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Unbiased estimation following a group sequential test , 1999 .

[35]  K McPherson On choosing the number of interim analyses in clinical trials. , 1982, Statistics in medicine.

[36]  J. Denne,et al.  ESTIMATION FOLLOWING EXTENSION OF A STUDY ON THE BASIS OF CONDITIONAL POWER , 2000, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[37]  W. Lehmacher,et al.  Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[38]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Asymmetric group sequential boundaries for monitoring clinical trials , 1982 .

[39]  S. Pocock Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials , 1977 .

[40]  P Bauer,et al.  Interim Analysis and Sample Size Reassessment , 2000, Biometrics.

[41]  T R Fleming,et al.  Designs for group sequential tests. , 1984, Controlled clinical trials.

[42]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Inference on Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials with Adaptive Interim Analyses , 1999 .

[43]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[44]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Blinded Sample Size Reestimation in Multiarmed Clinical Trials , 2000 .

[45]  L D Fisher,et al.  Self-designing clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[46]  T. Friede,et al.  Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[47]  John Whitehead,et al.  On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test , 1986 .

[48]  A L Gould,et al.  Interim analyses for monitoring clinical trials that do not materially affect the type I error rate. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[49]  P Bauer,et al.  Flexible Two-Stage Designs: An Overview , 2001, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[50]  M. Hellmich Monitoring Clinical Trials with Multiple Arms , 2001, Biometrics.

[51]  S. Emerson,et al.  A computationally simpler algorithm for the UMVUE of a normal mean following a group sequential trial. , 1997, Biometrics.

[52]  P. Bauer,et al.  Trendtests with adaptive scoring , 2000 .

[53]  G. Hommel,et al.  Multiple Comparisons of Treatments with Stable Multivariate Tests in a Two‐Stage Adaptive Design, Including a Test for Non‐Inferiority , 2000 .

[54]  Gernot Wassmer,et al.  Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures , 2000 .

[55]  Lakhbir S. Hayre Group Sequential Sampling with Variable Group Sizes , 1985 .

[56]  Michael A. Proschan,et al.  Effects of assumption violations on type I error rate in group sequential monitoring , 1992 .

[57]  Gernot Wassmer,et al.  A Technical Note on the Power Determination for Fisher's Combination Test , 1997 .

[58]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[59]  HansâHelge Müller,et al.  Adaptive Group Sequential Designs for Clinical Trials: Combining the Advantages of Adaptive and of Classical Group Sequential Approaches , 2001 .

[60]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[61]  P. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. , 1994, Biometrics.

[62]  G. Hommel Adaptive Modifications of Hypotheses After an Interim Analysis , 2001 .

[63]  M. Proschan,et al.  Internal pilot studies I: type I error rate of the naive t-test. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[64]  T. Friede,et al.  A comparison of methods for adaptive sample size adjustment , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[65]  M. Neuhäuser An Adaptive Location-Scale Test , 2001 .

[66]  G Wassmer,et al.  A comparison of two methods for adaptive interim analyses in clinical trials. , 1998, Biometrics.

[67]  Gernot Wassmer,et al.  Conditional Point Estimation in Adaptive Group Sequential Test Designs , 2001 .

[68]  D. Zucker,et al.  Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[69]  P. Bauer,et al.  Adaptive Two Stage Designs and the Conditional Error Function , 1999 .