Image quality evaluation with a new phase rotation beamformer

Over the last few decades, dynamic focusing based on digital receive beamforming (DRBF) has led to significant improvements in image quality. However, it is computationally very demanding due to its requirement for multiple lowpass filters (e.g., a complex filter for each receive channel in quadrature demodulation-based phase rotation beamform- ers (QD-PRBF)). We recently developed a novel phase rotation beamformer with reduced complexity, which can lower: 1) the number of lowpass filters using 2-stage demodulation (TSD) and 2) the number of beamforming points using adap tive field-of-view (AFOV) imaging. In TSD, dynamic focusing is performed on the mixed signals, while sampling frequency of the beamformed signal (i.e., beamforming frequency) is adjusted based on the displayed field-of-view (FOV) size in AFOV imaging. In this paper, the image quality of the developed beamformer (i.e., TSD-AFOV-PRBF) has been quantitatively evaluated using phantom and in vivo data. From the phantom study, it was found that TSD-AFOV-PRBF with only 1024 beamforming points provides comparable image quality to QD-PRBF. We obtained a median contrast resolution (CR) degradation of 7.6% for the FOV size of 160 mm. Image quality steadily improves with FOV size reduction (e.g., 2.3% CR degradation at 85 mm). Similar results were also obtained from an in vivo study. Thus, TSD-AFOV-PRBF could provide comparable image quality to conventional beamformers at considerably reduced computational cost.

[1]  V. Shamdasani,et al.  Ultrasound color-flow imaging on a programmable system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[2]  Song B. Park,et al.  Pipelined Sampled-Delay Focusing in Ultrasound Imaging Systems , 1987 .

[3]  Quan Chen,et al.  The ultrasonix 500RP: A commercial ultrasound research interface , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  B.D. Steinberg,et al.  Digital beamforming in ultrasound , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Adaptive field-of-view imaging for efficient receive beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging systems. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[6]  Song Bai Park,et al.  Sampling-point-wise digital dynamic focusing in the receive mode of an ultrasonic linear array imaging system , 1993 .

[7]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Delta-sigma oversampled ultrasound beamformer with dynamic delays , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  A Fully Programmable Computing Architecture for Medical Ultrasound Machines , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[9]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  P2D-6 Ultrasound Color Doppler Imaging on a Fully Programmable Architecture , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[10]  K. Ranganathan,et al.  Direct sampled I/Q beamforming for compact and very low-cost ultrasound imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Stergios Stergiopoulos,et al.  Advanced Signal Processing Handbook: Theory and Implementation for Radar, Sonar, and Medical Imaging Real-Time Systems , 2000 .

[12]  Tetsuya Hayashi,et al.  A single mediaprocessor-based programmable ultrasound system , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  A. Agarwal,et al.  New Demodulation Method for Efficient Phase-Rotation-Based Beamforming , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  M. Karaman,et al.  Digital phased array beamforming using single-bit delta-sigma conversion with non-uniform oversampling , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  P3G-7 Adaptive Field-of-View Imaging for Efficient Phase Rotation Beamforming , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.