Comments on an article by Kurt Kraiger et al. (see record 2022-67128-003). Kraiger et al. present an interesting overview of the current state of industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology graduate programs, specifically highlighting various quality metrics for comparing traditional classroom programs with online programs. An important note on this discussion is that the COVID-19 pandemic forced many traditional programs to become online, for better or for worse. Kraiger et al. report that most learning outcomes are comparable across program modality, with online programs or hybrid programs having a slight advantage on several outcome measures (e.g., declarative knowledge), so we question here how online programs could benefit particular groups of students who may feel a traditional face-to-face program is not for them. Kraiger et al. present various benefits of online programs (e.g., flexibility, lower cost) that may help disadvantaged groups (e.g., single parents). The goal of this paper is to add to this plentiful discussion with another extremely important factor: Can online graduate programs help reduce implicit bias and/or increase equity for disadvantaged groups compared with the traditional face-to-face programs? Thus, authors first review empirical research highlighting the discrimination experienced by the disadvantaged groups in graduate programs. Next, authors discuss the benefits of online graduate programs that can potentially help address some of the drawbacks that disadvantaged groups have experienced in a traditional academic institution. Authors then outline a few potential negatives of online graduate programs to caution the key stakeholders of academia. Finally, authors provide recommendations for key stakeholders on how to leverage the benefits and reduce drawbacks to provide a meaningful online graduate program experience to these students. Given that minority students have faced discrimination in traditional academic institutions, authors highlighted the benefits of online graduate programs that could potentially help address such incidents. Authors encourage stakeholders in the academic world to explore the potential positives of the online medium that the COVID-19 pandemic has forced on us. Authors hope that this paper will provide universities ideas on how they can enhance minority students' experiences and truly leverage the advantages of online graduate programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
[1]
Traci Sitzmann,et al.
Online I-O graduate education: Where are we and where should we go?
,
2022,
Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[2]
Christopher P. Scheitle,et al.
Science Graduate Students’ Reports of Discrimination Due to Gender, Race, and Religion: Identifying Shared and Unique Predictors
,
2021,
Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World.
[3]
W. J. Quinton.
Unwelcome on campus? Predictors of prejudice against international students.
,
2019,
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education.
[4]
Kaye Shelton,et al.
African American Males and Online Education: A Review of the Literature.
,
2017
.
[5]
Alec M Smidt,et al.
"Still second class: Sexual harassment of graduate students": Corrigendum.
,
2016
.
[6]
Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.
Still Second Class
,
2016
.
[7]
John P. Dugan,et al.
Transgender College Students: An Exploratory Study of Perceptions, Engagement, and Educational Outcomes
,
2012
.
[8]
Sterett H. Mercer,et al.
Barriers to the Success of Ethnic Minority Students in School Psychology Graduate Programs
,
2012
.
[9]
A. Cabrera,et al.
The Role of Perceptions of Prejudice and Discrimination on the Adjustment of Minority Students to College
,
1996
.
[10]
S. Orsillo,et al.
Values, acceptance, and belongingess in graduate school: Perspectives from underrepresented minority students
,
2020,
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science.