Allelopathic potential and competitive traits of sweetpotato cultivars

Allelopathy and competition are components of plant-plant interactions, delimiting the level of interference. Understanding this interaction has practical applications in agriculture. Crop cultivars possessing high allelopathic ability and competitive traits are themselves tools for sustainable weed management, enabling reduced use of herbicides. Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to assess the weed suppressive ability of selected sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) cultivars. The effect of nine cultivars on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), junglerice (Echinochloa colona L.), and hemp sesbania (Sesbania hederacea P. Mill.) was first evaluated in the greenhouse. The experiment was set up in a completely randomized design with four replications and conducted twice. Sweetpotatoes were cultured in sand. The target weeds were seeded in pots filled with a 2:1 mix of field soil:potting mix and watered with 100-ml aliquot of sweetpotato root leachates once every 2 d. Weed height and shoot biomass were measured. ‘Heartogold’, ‘Centennial’, and ‘Stokes Purple’ were the most allelopathic cultivars. Junglerice was most inhibited by sweetpotato leachates. Nine cultivars were evaluated in the field. Experiments were conducted at Fayetteville and Kibler, Arkansas, USA, in a split-plot design, with weed infestation (broadleaf spp., grass spp., or weed-free) as whole plot and the cultivars as split-plot. Across locations, ‘Beauregard-14’ had the longest vines, whereas ‘Hatteras’ and ‘Heartogold’ had the tallest canopy. ‘Heartogold’ had the largest leaf area. This cultivar reduced weed biomass 2- to 4-fold in both locations. Yield was reduced on average 55 and 68% with grass and broadleaf weeds across locations, respectively. ‘Beauregard-14’ and ‘Bayou Belle-6’were the high-yielding cultivars in Kibler and Fayetteville. The highest yielding cultivars were not the most weed suppressive but did not incur the highest yield loss from weed competition, indicating the ability to withstand weed interference. Cultivar competitiveness, weed-suppressive ability, and weed tolerance are important factors that should be considered before making a cultivar selection.

[1]  G. Mauromicale,et al.  Crop Allelopathy for Sustainable Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Knowing the Present with a View to the Future , 2021, Agronomy.

[2]  T. Tseng,et al.  Technology Levels in Cassava Cultivation Alter Phytosociology of Weeds , 2021, HortScience.

[3]  B. Soni,et al.  Identification and Quantification of Allelochemicals from Selected Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Cultivars , 2019, American Journal of Plant Sciences.

[4]  Nicholas T. Basinger,et al.  Interspecific and intraspecific interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in sweetpotato , 2019, Weed Science.

[5]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Sweetpotato: Important Weeds and Sustainable Weed Management , 2018, Weed Control.

[6]  Liu Changhui,et al.  A novel screening method for rice allelopathic potential: the inhibitory‐circle method , 2015 .

[7]  A. Dadkhah Allelopathic potential of canola and wheat to control weeds in soybean (Glycine max) , 2015, Russian Agricultural Sciences.

[8]  Bhagirath S. Chauhan,et al.  Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems , 2015 .

[9]  A. M. Atteya,et al.  Allelopathic effects of Sonchus oleraceus L. on the germination and seedling growth of crop and weed species. , 2014 .

[10]  E. Miotto,et al.  Competitive ability of soybean cultivars with horseweed (Conyza bonariensis) , 2013 .

[11]  K. Neil Harker,et al.  Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management , 2013, Weed Technology.

[12]  N. Nakagoshi,et al.  Allelopathic interference of sweet potato with cogongrass and relevant species , 2012, Plant Ecology.

[13]  Wengui Yan,et al.  Weed Suppression Potential of ‘Rondo’ and Other Indica Rice Germplasm Lines , 2012, Weed technology.

[14]  Yongqing Ma,et al.  Screening of Some Cotton Varieties for Allelopathic Potential on Clover Broomrape Germination , 2012 .

[15]  J. Fordyce,et al.  Can optimal defence theory be used to predict the distribution of plant chemical defences? , 2010 .

[16]  Katherine M. Jennings,et al.  Interference of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Sweetpotato , 2010, Weed Science.

[17]  J. Pratley,et al.  The specificity of allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa) , 2010 .

[18]  N. O. Bertholdsson,et al.  Breeding spring wheat for improved allelopathic potential. , 2010 .

[19]  Preben Klarskov Hansen,et al.  A weed suppressive index for spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties , 2008 .

[20]  J. O'donovan,et al.  Cultivar and Seeding Rate Effects on the Competitive Ability of Spring Cereals Grown under Organic Production in Northern Canada , 2007 .

[21]  J. Pratley,et al.  Autotoxicity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as determined by laboratory bioassays , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[22]  Svend Christensen,et al.  Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties , 2006 .

[23]  H. Boo,et al.  Difference in Allelopathic Potential as Influenced by Root Periderm Colour of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) , 2005 .

[24]  M. VanGessel,et al.  Corn leaf architecture as a tool for weed management in two corn production systems , 2004, Weed Science.

[25]  Gurjeet Gill,et al.  The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia , 2004 .

[26]  Mingfang Zhang,et al.  Effects of root exudates and aqueous root extracts of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and allelochemicals, on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzymes in cucumber , 2003 .

[27]  Brigitte Courtois,et al.  Improving crop competitive ability using allelopathy — an example from rice , 2002 .

[28]  Olofsdotter,et al.  Weed-suppressing rice cultivars – does allelopathy play a role? , 1999 .

[29]  B. Verbeek,et al.  The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds , 1996 .

[30]  N. Jordan Prospects for Weed Control Through Crop Interference. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  M. Levett Effects of various hand-weeding programmes on yield and components of yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) grown in the tropical lowlands of Papua New Guinea , 1992, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[32]  A. Hall,et al.  Effect of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Infestations on Light Interception and Growth Rate of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) , 1991, Weed Science.

[33]  R. Balyan,et al.  Competitive Ability of Winter Wheat Cultivars with Wild Oat (Avena ludoviciana) , 1991, Weed Science.

[34]  A. I. Hsiao,et al.  Wild oat and barley interactions: varietal differences in competitiveness in relation to phosphorus supply , 1989 .

[35]  V. A. Johnson,et al.  Competition Between Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars and Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) , 1986, Weed Science.

[36]  J. Chandler,et al.  Yields of Three Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Cultivars as Influenced by Spurred Anoda (Anoda cristata) Competition , 1983, Weed Science.

[37]  A. Putnam,et al.  Biological Suppression of Weeds: Evidence for Allelopathy in Accessions of Cucumber , 1974, Science.

[38]  D. Clements,et al.  Allelopathic Effects of Three Sweet Potato Cultivars (Ipomoea batatas) on the Invasive Plant Mikania micrantha. , 2018, Pakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS.

[39]  T. Xuan,et al.  Allelopathic potential of sweet potato varieties to control weeds: Imperata cylindrica, Bidens pilosa and Ageratum conyzoides. , 2016 .

[40]  S. Hoad,et al.  Designing crops for low input and organic systems: Enhancing wheat competitive ability against weeds , 2006 .

[41]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Phytotoxic substances in root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[42]  R. Blackshaw,et al.  Comparative survey of weeds surviving in triazine-tolerant and conventional canola crops in south-eastern Australia , 2001 .