Influence of Industry Characteristics on Information Technology Outsourcing

Despite the extensive research on information technology (IT) outsourcing, our knowledge and understanding of how industry characteristics impact the use of IT outsourcing remain limited. Drawing upon theories from organization behavior and industrial economics, this study identifies four major industry characteristics (i.e., munificence, dynamism, concentration, and capital intensity) and investigates how each of these factors affects the use of IT outsourcing. Specifically, we postulate that the extent of industry munificence is positively related to the utilization of IT outsourcing. Since timely strategic actions are the crucial aspects of leveraging munificent resources, IT outsourcing, which can be implemented in short periods of time, is considered to be a preferred option in such environments. Furthermore, industry dynamism is also positively associated with IT outsourcing, given that firms in dynamically evolving industries tend to look for flexibility and avoid a large amount of fixed investments (e.g., IT development in-house). In contrast to these hypotheses, we predict that industry concentration is negatively related to IT outsourcing. Firms in concentrated industries are likely to develop their own IT infrastructures, as they are not constrained by institutional pressures or cost-driven strategic actions. Finally, because firms in capital-intensive industries tend to conform to long-standing traditional practices, and do not highly value novel and risky practices, they will be less likely to use IT outsourcing than firms in industries with low capital intensity. The data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis along with Compustat empirically validated all of the proposed hypotheses; however, only marginal support was found for the association between industry concentration and IT outsourcing. Our findings offer business executives and IT service providers strategic and managerial insights into the dynamics and complexities involved in the diverse aspects of industry environments and IT outsourcing decisions.

[1]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management , 2005 .

[2]  B. Leca,et al.  How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[4]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[5]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  In praise of the Old I.O. , 2007 .

[6]  Alan R. Cannon,et al.  Measuring Environmental Complexity , 2007 .

[7]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[8]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  The Congruence Perspective of Organization Design: A Conceptual Model and Multivariate Research Approach , 1984 .

[9]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A framework for information technology outsourcing risk management , 2005, DATB.

[10]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[11]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  Strategy and industry effects on profitability: evidence from Greece , 2004 .

[12]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[13]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing , 1997 .

[14]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  A Learning Model of Information Technology Outsourcing: Normative Implications , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  K. Stiroh.  Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say? , 2001 .

[16]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[17]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[18]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  CEO Characteristics: Does Industry Matter? , 1996 .

[19]  PinsonneaultAlain,et al.  Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Organizational Downsizing , 2002 .

[20]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  IS outsourcing practices in the USA, Japan and Finland: a comparative study , 1997, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms , 1999 .

[22]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Proximity and Information Technology Outsourcing: How Local Are IT Services Markets? , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Lawrence Loh,et al.  Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Production and Transaction Economies and IS Outsourcing: A Study of the U.S. Banking Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[26]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Information technology sourcing: Fifteen years of learning , 2009 .

[27]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Industry structure and CEO characteristics: an empirical study of succession events , 1998 .

[28]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[29]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[30]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Determinants and Consequences of Firm Information Technology Budgets , 2008 .

[31]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance , 1992 .

[32]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Just Right Outsourcing: Understanding and Managing Risk , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  The Value Relevance of Announcements of Transformational Information Technology Investments , 2003, MIS Q..

[35]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Strategic use of the Internet and e-commerce: Cisco Systems , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Organizational Downsizing: A Tale of Two American Cities , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[38]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[40]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  A Transaction Cost Perspective of the "Software as a Service" Business Model , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[42]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  Domestic and global outsourcing practices of America's most effective IS users , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[43]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[44]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2007 .

[45]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[46]  Sabyasachi Mitra,et al.  Information Technology as an Enabler of Growth in Firms: An Empirical Assessment , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  A Comparison of Transaction Cost, Agency, and Knowledge-Based Predictors of IT Outsourcing Decisions: A U.S.-Japan Cross-Cultural Field Study , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[49]  Natalia Levina,et al.  From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in IT Outsourcing , 2003 .

[50]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  IT Outsourcing Strategies: Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Explanations of Success , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm , 2003 .

[53]  H. Mann,et al.  Seller Concentration, Barriers to Entry, and Rates of Return in Thirty Industries, 1950-1960 , 1966 .

[54]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment , 2005 .

[55]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage , 2001 .

[56]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[57]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[58]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach , 1991 .

[59]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  John E. Prescott,et al.  The Evolution of Interfirm Networks: Environmental Effects on Patterns of Network Change , 2006 .

[61]  Gary J. Castrogiovanni,et al.  Organization Task Environments: Have they Changed Fundamentally over Time? , 2002 .

[62]  Ishtiaq P. Mahmood,et al.  Inter-industry differences in profitability: the legacy of the structure–efficiency debate revisited , 2009 .

[63]  Arvin Sahaym,et al.  The influence of R&D investment on the use of corporate venture capital: An industry-level analysis , 2010 .

[64]  Vilmos F. Misangyi,et al.  A new perspective on a fundamental debate: a multilevel approach to industry, corporate, and business unit effects , 2006 .

[65]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[66]  Bandula Jayatilaka,et al.  Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature , 2004, DATB.

[67]  Craig M. Newmark,et al.  Price-Concentration Studies: There You Go Again , 2004 .

[68]  Anthony DiRomualdo,et al.  Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing , 1998 .

[69]  Philip G. Gayle.  An Empirical Analysis of the Competitive Effects of the Delta/Continental/Northwest Code‐Share Alliance , 2008, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[70]  Rob Kling,et al.  Informational Environments: Organizational Contexts of Online Information Use , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[71]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Information Technology Sourcing Practices: Lessons From Experience , 1998, MIS Q..

[72]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[74]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[75]  Soon Ang,et al.  Employment outsourcing in information systems , 1996, CACM.

[76]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Strategy‐making and environment: The third link , 1983 .

[77]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[78]  Ting Zhu,et al.  Pricing and Market Concentration in Oligopoly Markets , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[79]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[80]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance , 1988 .

[81]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  The myths and realities of information technology insourcing , 2000, CACM.

[82]  Mark J. Safferstone.  Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology , 1998 .

[83]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Entry barriers and new venture performance: a comparison of universal and contingency approaches , 2001 .

[84]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Dumb and Dumber: The Impact of Downsizing on Firm Performance as Moderated by Industry Conditions , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[85]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  The Market's Perception of the Transactional Risks of Information Technology Outsourcing Announcements , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[86]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  The information technology outsourcing risk: a transaction cost and agency theory-based perspective , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[87]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[88]  Gary J. Castrogiovanni,et al.  Environmental Munihcence; A Theoretical Assessment , 1991 .

[89]  Namgyoo K. Park,et al.  Before and after the technology sector crash: the effect of environmental munificence on stock market response to alliances of e‐commerce firms , 2005 .

[90]  A. Hargadon.  Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[91]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research , 2005, MIS Q..

[92]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Why Do Some Firms Outsource IT More Aggressively Than Others? The Effects of Organizational Characteristics on IT Outsourcing Decisions , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[93]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  The Relationships between Top Management Demographic Characteristics, Rational Decision Making, Environmental Munificence, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[94]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[95]  James V. Koch,et al.  Industrial organization and Prices , 1973 .

[96]  Brad Quinn Post,et al.  A Business Case Framework for Group Support Technology , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[97]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[98]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing 1, 2 , 2003 .