Validation of multiplex immunohistochemistry assays using automated image analysis

Multiplex brightfield immunohistochemistry (IHC) offers the potential advantage to simultaneously analyze multiple biomarkers in order to, for example, determine T-cell numbers and phenotypes in a patient’s immune response to cancer. This paper presents a fully automatic image-analysis framework to utilize multiplex assays to identify and count stained cells of interest; it was validated by comparison with multiple “gold standard” 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) singleplex assays. Both multiplex and singleplex assays were digitized using an RGB slide scanner. The proposed image-analysis algorithms consist of 1) a novel color-deconvolution method, 2) cell candidate detection, 3) feature extraction, and 4) cell classification based on supervised machine learning. Fully automated cell counts on the singleplex images were first rigorously verified by comparing to experts’ ground truth counts: A total of 72,076 for CD3-, 34,133 for CD8-, and 2,615 for FoxP3-positive T-cells were used in this singleplex algorithm validation. Concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of the singleplex algorithm-to-observer agreements were 0.945, 0.965, and 0.997, respectively. Then, the singleplex slides were registered to the adjacent multiplex slides and the automated cell counts for each were compared. For this validation of the multiplex assay cell counts, the CCC values were 0.914, 0.943, and 0.877 for 12,828, 2,545, and 1,647 cells, respectively; we observed good slide-to-slide agreement between multiplex and singleplex. We conclude that the proposed fully-automated image analysis can be a useful and reliable tool to assess multiplex IHC assays.

[1]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[2]  T. Meckel,et al.  A Model based Survey of Colour Deconvolution in Diagnostic Brightfield Microscopy: Error Estimation and Spectral Consideration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  M. Calaminici,et al.  Revisiting the immune microenvironment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using a tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry: robust semi-automated analysis reveals CD3 and FoxP3 as potential predictors of response to R-CHOP , 2015, Haematologica.

[4]  Automated Image Analysis of Lymphocytes in Lymphocytic Colitis , 2015 .

[5]  Jörg Bredno,et al.  Using contextual information to classify nuclei in histology images , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[6]  Anindya Sarkar,et al.  A robust method for inter-marker whole slide registration of digital pathology images using lines based features , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[7]  Lei Jin,et al.  Image analysis for accurately counting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in human tissue. , 2015, Journal of virological methods.

[8]  Qing Yang,et al.  Iterative Voting for Inference of Structural Saliency and Characterization of Subcellular Events , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  L. Morrison,et al.  Covalently deposited dyes: a new chromogen paradigm that facilitates analysis of multiple biomarkers in situ , 2017, Laboratory Investigation.

[10]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  A multi-label front propagation approach for object segmentation , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[12]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.